Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2013Financiación no declarada

Neuromuscular responses to incremental caffeine doses: performance and side effects

Pallarés JG, Fernández-Elías VE, Ortega JF, Muñoz G, Muñoz-Guerra J, Mora-Rodríguez R

Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 140 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2013-05-11 · Med Sci Sports Exerc · vol. 45 · número 11 · págs. 2184–2192
Editorial
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citado
180 citas · más que el 95% de estudios similares · 4.6× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
41 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Coffee research and impacts · Sports Performance and Training · Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Palabras clave
caffeine, ergogenic aids, muscle strength, muscle power, neuromuscular performance, dose-response relationship, resistance training, squatting, bench press, cycling power output, propulsive velocity, caffeine side effects, resistance-trained men
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, urine, humans, gastrointestinal diseases, headache, tachycardia, caffeine, central nervous system stimulants, cross-over studies, double-blind method, weight lifting, adult, male, muscle strength, athletic performance, young adult, myalgia

6 autores

  • Jesús G. Pallarés🇪🇸University of Castilla-La Mancha
  • Valentín E. Fernández-Elías🇪🇸University of Castilla-La Mancha
  • JUAN FERNANDO ORTEGA🇪🇸University of Castilla-La Mancha
  • Glòria Muñoz
  • Jesús Muñoz‐Guerra
  • Ricardo Mora‐Rodríguez🇪🇸University of Castilla-La Mancha

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the oral dose of caffeine needed to increase muscle force and power output during all-out single multijoint movements.

Methods

Thirteen resistance-trained men underwent a battery of muscle strength and power tests in a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, under four different conditions: (a) placebo ingestion (PLAC) or with caffeine ingestion at doses of (b) 3 mg · kg(-1) body weight (CAFF 3mg), (c) 6 mg · kg(-1) (CAFF 6mg), and (d) 9 mg · kg(-1) (CAFF 9mg). The muscle strength and power tests consisted in the measurement of bar displacement velocity and muscle power output during free-weight full-squat (SQ) and bench press (BP) exercises against four incremental loads (25%, 50%, 75%, and 90% one-repetition maximum [1RM]). Cycling peak power output was measured using a 4-s inertial load test. Caffeine side effects were evaluated at the end of each trial and 24 h later.

Results

Mean propulsive velocity at light loads (25%-50% 1RM) increased significantly above PLAC for all caffeine doses (5.4%-8.5%, P = 0.039-0.003). At the medium load (75% 1RM), CAFF 3mg did not improve SQ or BP muscle power or BP velocity. CAFF 9mg was needed to enhance BP velocity and SQ power at the heaviest load (90% 1RM) and cycling peak power output (6.8%-11.7%, P = 0.03-0.05). The CAFF 9mg trial drastically increased the frequency of the adverse side effects (15%-62%).

Conclusions

The ergogenic dose of caffeine required to enhance neuromuscular performance during a single all-out contraction depends on the magnitude of load used. A dose of 3 mg · kg(-1) is enough to improve high-velocity muscle actions against low loads, whereas a higher caffeine dose (9 mg · kg(-1)) is necessary against high loads, despite the appearance of adverse side effects.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.