Changes in red meat consumption and subsequent risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: three cohorts of US men and women
Pan A, Sun Q, Bernstein AM, Manson JE, Willett WC, Hu FB
JAMA internal medicine · 167 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoMezcla carne procesada con no procesadaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Gobierno
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
- Gobierno
- National Cancer Institute
- Gobierno
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
- Gobierno
- NHLBI NIH HHS
- Gobierno
- NIDDK NIH HHS
- Gobierno
- NCI NIH HHS
- Subvenciones
- National Cancer Institute (R01‐CA050385); National Cancer Institute (U54CA155626); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K99 HL098459); National Cancer Institute (P01 CA055075.); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK046200); National Cancer Institute (P01 CA087969); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T-32 DK 007703); National Cancer Institute (U19 CA055075); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R00 HL098459); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01-DK058845)
Según 6 financiadores declarados.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2013-06-18 · JAMA Intern Med · vol. 173 · número 14 · pág. 1328
- Editorial
- American Medical Association
- Citado
- 231 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 22.7× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 15 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
- Áreas de investigación
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Fatty Acid Research and Health · Diet and metabolism studies
- Palabras clave
- Medicine, Red meat, Hazard ratio, Prospective cohort study, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Proportional hazards model, Environmental health, Diabetes mellitus, Demography, Cohort study, Cohort, Confidence interval, Internal medicine, Endocrinology
- MeSH
- humans, diabetes mellitus, type 2, weight gain, body mass index, diet, health surveys, proportional hazards models, follow-up studies, prospective studies, energy intake, meat, middle aged, united states, female, male, surveys and questionnaires
6 autores
- An Pan🇺🇸🇸🇬Harvard University; National University of Singapore; National University Health System
- Qi Sun🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Adam Bernstein🇺🇸Cleveland Clinic
- JoAnn E. Manson🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
- Walter Churchill Willett🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Frank B. Hu🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Importance
Red meat consumption has been consistently associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, whether changes in red meat intake are related to subsequent T2DM risk remains unknown.
Objective
To evaluate the association between changes in red meat consumption during a 4-year period and subsequent 4-year risk of T2DM in US adults.
Design and setting
Three prospective cohort studies in US men and women.
Participants
We followed up 26,357 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986-2006), 48,709 women in the Nurses' Health Study (1986-2006), and 74,077 women in the Nurses' Health Study II (1991-2007). Diet was assessed by validated food frequency questionnaires and updated every 4 years. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios with adjustment for age, family history, race, marital status, initial red meat consumption, smoking status, and initial and changes in other lifestyle factors (physical activity, alcohol intake, total energy intake, and diet quality). Results across cohorts were pooled by an inverse variance-weighted, fixed-effect meta-analysis.
Main outcomes and measures
Incident T2DM cases validated by supplementary questionnaires.
Results
During 1,965,824 person-years of follow-up, we documented 7540 incident T2DM cases. In the multivariate-adjusted models, increasing red meat intake during a 4-year interval was associated with an elevated risk of T2DM during the subsequent 4 years in each cohort (all P < .001 for trend). Compared with the reference group of no change in red meat intake, increasing red meat intake of more than 0.50 servings per day was associated with a 48% (pooled hazard ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.37-1.59) elevated risk in the subsequent 4-year period, and the association was modestly attenuated after further adjustment for initial body mass index and concurrent weight gain (1.30; 95% CI, 1.21-1.41). Reducing red meat consumption by more than 0.50 servings per day from baseline to the first 4 years of follow-up was associated with a 14% (pooled hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.93) lower risk during the subsequent entire follow-up through 2006 or 2007.
Conclusions and relevance
Increasing red meat consumption over time is associated with an elevated subsequent risk of T2DM, and the association is partly mediated by body weight. Our results add further evidence that limiting red meat consumption over time confers benefits for T2DM prevention.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.