Dietary intakes of red meat, poultry, and fish during high school and risk of colorectal adenomas in women
Nimptsch K, Bernstein AM, Giovannucci E, Fuchs CS, Willett WC, Wu K
American journal of epidemiology · 27 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoMezcla carne procesada con no procesadaSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Gobierno
- National Cancer Institute
- Gobierno
- NCI NIH HHS
- Subvenciones
- National Cancer Institute (R01‐CA050385); National Cancer Institute (P01 CA087969)
Según 2 financiadores declarados.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2013-06-19 · Am J Epidemiol · vol. 178 · número 2 · págs. 172–183
- Editorial
- Oxford University Press
- Citado
- 31 citas · más que el 72% de estudios similares · 0.7× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 47 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
- Áreas de investigación
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Palabras clave
- Red meat, Medicine, Colorectal adenoma, Odds ratio, Adenoma, Confidence interval, Colorectal cancer, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Physiology, Cancer, Pathology
- MeSH
- animals, poultry, cattle, humans, adenoma, colorectal neoplasms, colonoscopy, diet, diet surveys, multivariate analysis, logistic models, risk factors, follow-up studies, prospective studies, meat, seafood, adolescent, adult, middle aged, united states, female, young adult, surveys and questionnaires
6 autores
- Katharina Nimptsch🇺🇸Harvard University
- Adam Bernstein
- Edward L. Giovannucci
- Charles S. Fuchs
- Walter Churchill Willett
- Kana Wu
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Adolescent diet may be etiologically relevant for colorectal carcinogenesis. We examined the association between meat and fish intakes during adolescence and the risk of colorectal adenomas later in life among 19,771 women participating in the Nurses' Health Study II. Subjects had completed a validated food frequency questionnaire in 1998 (when aged 34-51 years) about their diets during high school and subsequently underwent at least 1 lower-bowel endoscopy during the study period (1998-2007). During this period, 1,494 subjects were diagnosed with colorectal adenomas. Intake of red meat during adolescence was not associated with colorectal adenoma risk when comparing those in the highest versus lowest category of intake (odds ratio (OR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81, 1.35). Similarly, intake of fish during adolescence was not associated with colorectal adenoma risk (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.78, 1.17). Intake of poultry during adolescence was associated with a lower risk of total colorectal (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.99), distal (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.51, 0.99), rectal (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29, 0.90), and advanced (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38, 0.93) adenomas. Replacement of 1 serving per day of red meat with 1 serving per day of poultry or fish was associated with 41% and 35% decreased risks for rectal adenomas and advanced adenomas, respectively. Our findings do not suggest an association between red meat intake during adolescence and colorectal adenomas later in life, but higher poultry intake during this time was associated with a lower risk of colorectal adenomas.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.