Association between red and processed meat intake and mortality among colorectal cancer survivors
McCullough ML, Gapstur SM, Shah R, Jacobs EJ, Campbell PT
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 78 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Mezcla carne procesada con no procesadaSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Gobierno
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Gobierno
- National Cancer Institute
Según 2 financiadores declarados.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2013-07-01 · J Clin Oncol · vol. 31 · número 22 · págs. 2773–2782
- Editorial
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Citado
- 97 citas · más que el 99% de estudios similares · 10.7× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 37 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
- Áreas de investigación
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Cancer Risks and Factors
- Palabras clave
- Medicine, Red meat, Colorectal cancer, Internal medicine, Proportional hazards model, Cancer, Relative risk, Processed meat, Incidence (geometry), Cohort, Quartile, Cohort study, Confidence interval, Pathology
- MeSH
- humans, colorectal neoplasms, proportional hazards models, cohort studies, meat, meat products, aged, aged, 80 and over, middle aged, survivors, female, male
5 autores
- Marjorie L. McCullough🇺🇸American Cancer Society
- Susan M. Gapstur🇺🇸American Cancer Society
- Roma A. Shah🇺🇸American Cancer Society
- Eric J. Jacobs🇺🇸American Cancer Society
- Peter T. Campbell🇺🇸American Cancer Society
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Purpose
Red and processed meat intake is convincingly associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence, but its impact on prognosis after CRC diagnosis is unknown. We examined associations of red and processed meat consumption, self-reported before and after cancer diagnosis, with all-cause and cause-specific mortality among men and women with invasive, nonmetastatic CRC.
Patients and methods
Participants in the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort reported information on diet and other factors at baseline in 1992-1993, 1999, and 2003. Participants with a verified CRC diagnosis after baseline and up to June 30, 2009, were observed for mortality through December 31, 2010.
Results
Among 2,315 participants diagnosed with CRC, 966 died during follow-up (413 from CRC and 176 from cardiovascular disease [CVD]). In multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models, red and processed meat intake before CRC diagnosis was associated with higher risks of death as a result of all causes (top v bottom quartile, relative risk [RR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.59; Ptrend = .03) and from CVD (RR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.00 to 2.67; Ptrend = .08) but not CRC (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.51; Ptrend = 0.54). Although red and processed meat consumption after CRC diagnosis was not associated with mortality, survivors with consistently high (median or higher) intakes before and after diagnosis had a higher risk of CRC-specific mortality (RR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.89) compared with those with consistently low intakes.
Conclusion
This study suggests that greater red and processed meat intake before diagnosis is associated with higher risk of death among patients with nonmetastatic CRC.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.