Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2013Financiación no declaradaSolo mecanismos

Differential modulation of human intestinal bifidobacterium populations after consumption of a wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) drink

Guglielmetti S, Fracassetti D, Taverniti V, Del Bo' C, Vendrame S, Klimis-Zacas D, Arioli S, Riso P, Porrini M

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 86 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declaradaSolo mecanismos

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Solo mecanismos
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2013-07-25 · J Agric Food Chem · vol. 61 · número 34 · págs. 8134–8140
Editorial
American Chemical Society
Citado
125 citas · más que el 97% de estudios similares · 5.7× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
53 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology · Gut microbiota and health · Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Palabras clave
Bifidobacterium longum, Biology, Vaccinium, Bifidobacterium, Feces, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Food science, Polyphenol, Fermentation, Actinomycetaceae, Health benefits, Microbiology, Botany, Traditional medicine, Lactobacillus, Biochemistry, Medicine
MeSH
intestines, feces, humans, bifidobacterium, biodiversity, beverages, adult, middle aged, male, blueberry plants

9 autores

  • Simone Guglielmetti🇮🇹 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Milan
  • Daniela Fracassetti🇮🇹University of Milan
  • Valentina Taverniti🇮🇹🇺🇸University of Milan; University of Maine
  • Cristian Del Bo’🇮🇹University of Milan
  • Stefano Vendrame🇺🇸University of Maine
  • Dorothy J. Klimis‐Zacas🇺🇸University of Maine
  • Stefania Arioli🇮🇹🇺🇸University of Milan; University of Maine
  • Patrizia Riso🇮🇹University of Milan
  • Marisa Porrini🇮🇹University of Milan

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Bifidobacteria are gaining increasing interest as health-promoting bacteria. Nonetheless, the genus comprises several species, which can exert different effects on human host. Previous studies showed that wild blueberry drink consumption could selectively increase intestinal bifidobacteria, suggesting an important role for the polyphenols and fiber present in wild blueberries. This study evaluated the modulation of the most common and abundant bifidobacterial taxonomic groups inhabiting the human gut in the same fecal samples. The analyses carried out showed that B. adolescentis, B. breve, B. catenulatum/pseudocatelulatum, and B. longum subsp. longum were always present in the group of subjects enrolled, whereas B. bifidum and B. longum subsp. infantis were not. Furthermore, it was found that the most predominant bifidobacterial species were B. longum subsp. longum and B. adolescentis. The results obtained revealed a high interindividual variability; however, a significant increase of B. longum subsp. infantis cell concentration was observed in the feces of volunteers after the wild blueberry drink treatment. This bifidobacterial group was shown to possess immunomodulatory abilities and to relieve symptoms and promote the regression of several gastrointestinal disorders. Thus, an increased cell concentration of B. longum subsp. infantis in the human gut could be considered of potential health benefit. In conclusion, wild blueberry consumption resulted in a specific bifidogenic effect that could positively affect certain populations of bifidobacteria with demonstrated health-promoting properties.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.