Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2014Financiación no declarada

The effects of polyethylene glycosylated creatine supplementation on anaerobic performance measures and body composition

Camic CL, Housh TJ, Zuniga JM, Traylor DA, Bergstrom HC, Schmidt RJ, Johnson GO, Housh DJ

Journal of strength and conditioning research · 18 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2013-07-27 · J Strength Cond Res · vol. 28 · número 3 · págs. 825–833
Editorial
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citado
27 citas · más que el 78% de estudios similares · 1.4× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
49 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Sports Performance and Training · Biochemical effects in animals
Palabras clave
creatine supplementation, ergogenic aids, anaerobic performance, vertical jump, agility, change of direction ability, muscular endurance, muscle strength, body composition, body mass
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, humans, polyethylene glycols, creatine, exercise test, double-blind method, body composition, anaerobic threshold, physical endurance, running, weight lifting, dietary supplements, male, muscle strength, athletic performance, young adult

8 autores

  • Clayton L. Camic🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln; Creighton University; University of Wisconsin–La Crosse; University of Nebraska Medical Center
  • Terry J. Housh🇺🇸University of Nebraska–Lincoln
  • Jorge M. Zuñiga🇺🇸Creighton University
  • Daniel A. Traylor🇺🇸University of Nebraska–Lincoln; University of Nebraska Medical Center
  • Haley C. Bergstrom🇺🇸University of Nebraska–Lincoln
  • Richard J. Schmidt🇺🇸University of Nebraska–Lincoln
  • Glen O. Johnson🇺🇸University of Nebraska–Lincoln
  • Dona J. Housh🇺🇸University of Nebraska Medical Center

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of 28 days of polyethylene glycosylated creatine (PEG-creatine) supplementation (1.25 and 2.50 g·d) on anaerobic performance measures (vertical and broad jumps, 40-yard dash, 20-yard shuttle run, and 3-cone drill), upper- and lower-body muscular strength and endurance (bench press and leg extension), and body composition. This study used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel design. Seventy-seven adult men (mean age ± SD, 22.1 ± 2.5 years; body mass, 81.7 ± 10.8 kg) volunteered to participate and were randomly assigned to a placebo (n = 23), 1.25 g·d of PEG-creatine (n = 27), or 2.50 g·d of PEG-creatine (n = 27) group. The subjects performed anaerobic performance measures, muscular strength (one-repetition maximum [1RM]), and endurance (80% 1RM) tests for bench press and leg extension, and underwater weighing for the determination of body composition at day 0 (baseline), day 14, and day 28. The results indicated that there were improvements (p < 0.0167) in vertical jump, 20-yard shuttle run, 3-cone drill, muscular endurance for bench press, and body mass for at least one of the PEG-creatine groups without changes for the placebo group. Thus, the present results demonstrated that PEG-creatine supplementation at 1.25 or 2.50 g·d had an ergogenic effect on lower-body vertical power, agility, change-of-direction ability, upper-body muscular endurance, and body mass.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.