Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2013Financiación no declarada

Efficacy and safety of new complementary feeding guidelines with an emphasis on red meat consumption: a randomized trial in Bogota, Colombia

Olaya GA, Lawson M, Fewtrell MS

The American journal of clinical nutrition · 25 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Consumo medido con
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2013-08-15 · Am J Clin Nutr · vol. 98 · número 4 · págs. 983–993
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
49 citas · más que el 90% de estudios similares · 2.9× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
39 trabajos
Acceso
Lectura gratuita
Áreas de investigación
Child Nutrition and Water Access · Infant Nutrition and Health · Iron Metabolism and Disorders
Palabras clave
red meat consumption, infant iron status, linear growth, anemia, hemoglobin, serum ferritin, breastfeeding, socioeconomic deprivation, Bogotá, low-income infants, fruit and vegetable intake, iron deficiency anemia prevention
MeSH
animals, humans, fruit, vegetables, zinc, iron, dietary, hemoglobins, body height, hematocrit, diet, follow-up studies, safety, breast feeding, nutritional status, nutrition policy, infant food, meat, infant, colombia, infant nutritional physiological phenomena

3 autores

  • Gilma Aurora Olaya-Vega🇨🇴🇬🇧Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; University College London
  • Margaret S. Lawson🇨🇴Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
  • Mary S. Fewtrell🇨🇴Pontificia Universidad Javeriana

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Iron deficiency and poor linear growth are common in infants from deprived socioeconomic backgrounds and may be associated with inadequate complementary feeding (CF) practices.

Objective

We tested the hypothesis that new CF guidelines emphasizing meat as a source of iron and zinc would improve linear growth, iron, and zinc status in infants living in poor socioeconomic circumstances in Bogota, Colombia.

Design

A total of 85 term infants who were exclusively breastfed for ≥4 mo were randomly assigned at 6 mo of age to a control group [CG (n = 43); current advice] or intervention group (new guidelines group [NGG (n = 42); with counseling to 1) continue breastfeeding, 2) offer red meat ≥3 d/wk, and 3) offer fruit and vegetables daily]). Main outcomes were 1) linear growth from 6 to 12 mo of age; 2) hemoglobin, hematocrit, iron [serum ferritin (SF)], and zinc status at 12 mo of age; and 3) meat intake at 12 mo of age (by using a food-frequency questionnaire).

Results

A total of 38 infants/group provided data at 12 mo of age. NGG infants had significantly higher red meat intake [mean ± SD: 5.4 ± 1.8 compared with 3.5 ± 1.7 d/wk at 12 mo of age; P < 0.001), higher hemoglobin and hematocrit at 12 mo of age, and a significantly greater increase in hemoglobin (mean ± SD change: 0.41 ± 0.8 compared with -0.13 ± 1.0; P = 0.01) and hematocrit (1.04 ± 2.2 compared with -0.15 ± 2.4; P = 0.03) from 6 to 12 mo of age than those in CG infants. There were no significant differences in linear growth from 6 to 12 mo of age or in SF or zinc.

Conclusions

The new guidelines showed efficacy with higher red meat intake and positive effects on hemoglobin and hematocrit. The intervention was acceptable and affordable for most mothers. These preliminary results suggest that the intervention merits investigation in a larger cohort with longer-term follow-up. This trial was registered at http://isrctn.org as ISRCTN57733004.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.