Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio de casos y controles2014

Central aortic blood pressure of hypertensive men during short-term cold exposure

Hintsala H, Kandelberg A, Herzig KH, Rintamäki H, Mäntysaari M, Rantala A, Antikainen R, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, Jaakkola JJ, Ikäheimo TM

American journal of hypertension · 47 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de casos y controles (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos
Gobierno
National Institutes of Health

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2013-08-20 · Am J Hypertens · vol. 27 · número 5 · págs. 656–664
Editorial
Oxford University Press
Citado
62 citas · más que el 92% de estudios similares · 4.0× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
36 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Climate Change and Health Impacts · Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention · Sodium Intake and Health
Palabras clave
Medicine, Blood pressure, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Population, Aortic pressure, Pulse pressure
MeSH
aorta, brachial artery, humans, hypertension, hypothermia, risk factors, case-control studies, manometry, seasons, sex factors, body temperature regulation, time factors, aged, middle aged, finland, male, cold temperature, arterial pressure

10 autores

  • Heidi E. Hintsala🇫🇮University of Oulu
  • A. Kandelberg🇫🇮University of Oulu
  • Karl‐Heinz Herzig🇫🇮Kuopio University Hospital; University of Oulu
  • Hannu Rintamäki🇫🇮Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; University of Oulu
  • Matti Mäntysaari🇫🇮University of Oulu
  • Aino K. Rantala🇫🇮University of Oulu
  • Riitta Antikaínen🇫🇮Oulu University Hospital; University of Oulu
  • S. Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi🇫🇮Oulu University Hospital; University of Oulu
  • Jouni J. K. Jaakkola🇫🇮University of Oulu
  • Tiina Maria Ikäheimo🇫🇮University of Oulu

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Short- and long-term exposures to cold increase blood pressure and may explain the higher wintertime cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Hypertensive subjects may be more susceptible to adverse cold-related cardiovascular health effects. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of short-term cold exposure on central aortic blood pressure among untreated hypertensive men.

Methods

We conducted a population-based recruitment of 41 hypertensive men and a control group of 20 men without hypertension (aged 55-65 years) who underwent whole-body cold exposure (15-minute exposure to temperature -10 °C, wind 3 m/s, winter clothes). Central aortic blood pressure, augmentation index, and subendocardial viability ratio were measured by radial artery applanation tonometry.

Results

Short-term cold exposure increased the central aortic blood pressure similarly both in both hypertensive men, from 130/93 to 162/107 mm Hg (P < 0.001) and men in the control group, from 114/81 to 142/91 mmHg (P < 0.001). Augmentation index increased by 12% (from 10% to 22%, P < 0.001; and from 16% to 28%, P < 0.001, respectively), whereas subendocardial viability ratio decreased 10% (from 188% to 177%, P = 0.001; and from 203% to 193%, P = 0.01, respectively) during cold exposure in both hypertensive men and control subjects.

Conclusions

Short-term cold exposure increases central aortic blood pressure and cardiac workload, and myocardial oxygen demand slightly increases in relation to blood supply in untreated hypertensive middle-aged men. Because of the higher baseline blood pressure among hypertensive subjects, the cold-induced rise in central aortic blood pressure may increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular health effects.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.