Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2013Acceso abierto

Red and processed meat intake is associated with higher gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiological observational studies

Zhu H, Yang X, Zhang C, Zhu C, Tao G, Zhao L, Tang S, Shu Z, Cai J, Dai S, Qin Q, Xu L, Cheng H, Sun X

PloS one · 90 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Gobierno
Government of Jiangsu Province
Organización sin fines de lucro
Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology
Subvenciones
National Natural Science Foundation of China (BRA2012210); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81272504)

Según 3 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2013-08-14 · PLoS One · vol. 8 · número 8 · pág. e70955
Editorial
Public Library of Science
Citado
116 citas · más que el 83% de estudios similares · 1.9× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
73 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Palabras clave
Observational study, Epidemiology, Medicine, Cancer, Environmental health, Internal medicine, Biology, Bioinformatics
MeSH
humans, stomach neoplasms, risk, epidemiologic studies, eating, food handling, meat, observational studies as topic

14 autores

  • Hongcheng Zhu🇨🇳Jiangsu Province Hospital; Nanjing Medical University
  • Xi Yang🇨🇳Jiangsu Province Hospital; Nanjing Medical University
  • Chi Zhang🇨🇳Jiangsu Province Hospital; Nanjing Medical University
  • Chen Ying Zhu🇨🇳Nanjing Medical University
  • Guangzhou Tao🇨🇳Huaian First People’s Hospital; Nanjing Medical University
  • Lianjun Zhao🇨🇳Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital; Nanjing Medical University
  • Shaowen Tang🇨🇳Nanjing Medical University
  • Shu Sen Zheng🇨🇳Peking University
  • Jing Cai🇨🇳Nantong Tumor Hospital
  • Shengbin Dai🇨🇳Nantong University; Taizhou People's Hospital
  • Qin Qin🇨🇳Jiangsu Province Hospital; Nanjing Medical University
  • Liping Xu🇨🇳Jiangsu Province Hospital; Nanjing Medical University
  • Hongyan Cheng🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaJiangsu Province Hospital; Nanjing Medical University
  • Xinchen Sun🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaJiangsu Province Hospital; Nanjing Medical University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Red and processed meat was concluded as a limited-suggestive risk factor of gastric cancer by the World Cancer Research Fund. However, recent epidemiological studies have yielded inconclusive results.

Methods

We searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to April 2013 for both cohort and case-control studies which assessed the association between red and/or processed meat intake and gastric cancer risk. Study-specific relative risk estimates were polled by random-effect or fixed-effect models.

Results

Twelve cohort and thirty case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis. Significant associations were found between both red (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.22-1.73) and processed (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.26-1.65) meat intake and gastric cancer risk generally. Positive findings were also existed in the items of beef (RR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.04-1.57), bacon (RR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.17-1.61), ham (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.00-2.06), and sausage (RR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.16-1.52). When conducted by study design, the association was significant in case-control studies (RR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.33-1.99) but not in cohort studies (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.90-1.17) for red meat. Increased relative risks were seen in high-quality, adenocarcinoma, cardia and European-population studies for red meat. And most subgroup analysis confirmed the significant association between processed meat intake and gastric cancer risk.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that consumption of red and/or processed meat contributes to increased gastric cancer risk. However, further investigation is needed to confirm the association, especially for red meat.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.