Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2013Financiado por la industria

Financiado en parte por Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Amarin Corporation, Daiichi-Sankyo

Relationship of apolipoproteins A-1 and B, and lipoprotein(a) to cardiovascular outcomes: the AIM-HIGH trial (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL/High Triglyceride and Impact on Global Health Outcomes)

Albers JJ, Slee A, O'Brien KD, Robinson JG, Kashyap ML, Kwiterovich PO, Xu P, Marcovina SM

Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 259 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiado por la industria

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiado por la industria
Empresa
Abbott Laboratories
Empresa
Amgen
Empresa
Eli Lilly and Company
Empresa
Pfizer
Empresa
AstraZeneca
Empresa
Sanofi
Empresa
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Empresa
Amarin Corporation
Empresa
Daiichi-Sankyo
Gobierno
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Gobierno
NHLBI NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01 HL081649); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01-HL-081616); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-081616)

Según 11 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2013-08-21 · J Am Coll Cardiol · vol. 62 · número 17 · págs. 1575–1579
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
318 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 27.2× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
11 trabajos
Acceso
Lectura gratuita
Áreas de investigación
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health · Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins · Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Palabras clave
apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein B, lipoprotein(a), cardiovascular events, residual cardiovascular risk, nicotinic acid, simvastatin, ezetimibe, AIM-HIGH trial, metabolic syndrome, low HDL cholesterol, triglyceride elevation, ApoB/ApoA1 ratio, cardiovascular risk prediction, extended-release niacin
MeSH
humans, cardiovascular diseases, hypertriglyceridemia, niacin, simvastatin, triglycerides, lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein a-i, apolipoproteins b, treatment outcome, drug therapy, combination, prospective studies, double-blind method, aged, middle aged, female, male, cholesterol, hdl, hypoalphalipoproteinemias, biomarkers, metabolic syndrome

8 autores

  • John J. Albers🇺🇸University of Washington
  • April E Slee
  • Kevin D. O’Brien🇺🇸University of Washington
  • Jennifer G. Robinson🇺🇸University of Iowa
  • Moti L. Kashyap🇺🇸University of California, Irvine
  • Peter O. Kwiterovich🇺🇸Johns Hopkins University
  • Ping Xu
  • Santica M. Marcovina🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Washington

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objectives

This study sought to examine the relationship between baseline and on-study apolipoproteins (apo) A-1 and B and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels and the development of subsequent cardiovascular (CV) events in the AIM-HIGH (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL/High Triglyceride and Impact on Global Health Outcomes) trial.

Background

Niacin has been reported to lower apoB and Lp(a) and to raise apoA-1.

Methods

Individuals with CV disease and low baseline levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were randomized to simvastatin plus placebo or simvastatin, plus extended-release niacin ([ERN], 1,500 to 2,000 mg/day), with ezetimibe added as needed, in both groups, to maintain an on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the range of 40 to 80 mg/dl. Hazard ratios (HRs) were used to evaluate the relationship between levels of apoA-1, apoB, and Lp(a), and CV events in each treatment group.

Results

Baseline apoB and the apoB/apoA-I ratio were significantly predictive of CV events only for the placebo group (HR: 1.17 [p = 0.018] and HR: 1.19 [p = 0.016]). Baseline and on-study Lp(a) were predictive of CV events in both simvastatin plus placebo (baseline HR: 1.24 [p = 0.002] and on-study HR: 1.21 [p = 0.017]) and the simvastatin plus ERN group (baseline HR: 1.25 [p = 0.001] and on-study HR: 1.18 [p = 0.028]). The ERN modestly increased 1-year apoA-1 (7%), decreased apoB (13%), decreased the ApoB/ApoA-1 ratio (19%), and decreased Lp(a) 21%, but did not reduce CV events.

Conclusions

Lp(a) was associated with increased CV risk in both treatment groups indicating that it contributes to residual CV risk. However, there was no evidence that ERN reduced CV risk, despite favorable lipoprotein changes.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.