Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2014

Is vitamin D deficiency a major global public health problem?

Palacios C, Gonzalez L

The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology · 779 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Gobierno
NIMHD NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (8G12MD007600); National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (G12 MD007600)

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2013-11-12 · J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol · vol. 144 · págs. 138–145
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
1,251 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 23.4× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
113 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
Áreas de investigación
Vitamin D Research Studies · Nutrition and Health Studies · Vitamin K Research Studies
Palabras clave
vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D status, global prevalence, vulnerable populations, infants and children, adolescents, pregnant women, women of reproductive age, Middle East, data gaps, vitamin D fortification, ultraviolet radiation
MeSH
humans, vitamin d deficiency, public health, dietary supplements, global health

2 autores

  • Cristina S Palacios🇵🇷 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus; University of Puerto Rico System
  • Lilliana González🇵🇷University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus; University of Puerto Rico System

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Vitamin D deficiency is a major public health problem worldwide in all age groups, even in those residing in countries with low latitude, where it was generally assumed that UV radiation was adequate enough to prevent this deficiency, and in industrialized countries, where vitamin D fortification has been implemented now for years. However, most countries are still lacking data, particularly population representative data, with very limited information in infants, children, adolescents and pregnant women. Since the number of recent publications is escalating, with a broadening of the geographic diversity, the objective of the present report was to conduct a more recent systematic review of global vitamin D status, with particular emphasis in at risk groups. A systematic review was conducted in PubMed/Medline in April-June 2013 to identify articles on vitamin D status worldwide published in the last 10 years in apparently healthy individuals. Only studies with vitamin D status prevalence were included. If available, the first source selected was population-based or representative samples studies. Clinical trials, case-control studies, case reports or series, reviews, validation studies, letters, editorials, or qualitative studies were excluded. A total of 103 articles were eligible and included in the present report. Maps were created for each age group, providing an updated overview of global vitamin D status. In areas with available data, the prevalence of low vitamin D status is a global problem in all age groups, in particular in girls and women from the Middle East. These maps also evidenced the regions with missing data for each specific population groups. There is striking lack of data in infants, children and adolescents worldwide, and in most countries of South America and Africa. In conclusion, vitamin D deficiency is a global public health problem in all age groups, particularly in those from the Middle East. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled '16th Vitamin D Workshop'.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.