Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2014

Large, single-dose, oral vitamin D supplementation in adult populations: a systematic review

Kearns MD, Alvarez JA, Tangpricha V

Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 98 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Gobierno
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Gobierno
NCATS NIH HHS
Gobierno
NIDDK NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 TR000454); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK007298)

Según 4 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2013-11-18 · Endocr Pract · vol. 20 · número 4 · págs. 341–351
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
136 citas · más que el 67% de estudios similares · 0.9× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
60 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
Áreas de investigación
Vitamin D Research Studies · Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments · Nutrition and Health Studies
Palabras clave
vitamin D supplementation, vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D3, vitamin D2, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone, bone health, adults
MeSH
humans, parathyroid hormone, vitamin d, administration, oral, dietary supplements, adult

3 autores

  • Malcolm D. Kearns🇺🇸Emory University
  • Jessica A. Alvarez🇺🇸Emory University
  • Vin Tangpricha🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaEmory University; Atlanta VA Medical Center

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

Daily vitamin D supplementation is often inadequate in treating vitamin D deficiency due to poor compliance. A single, large dose of vitamin D given at timed intervals may be an alternative strategy.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature review to investigate the efficacy of a single large bolus dose to treat vitamin D deficiency. We identified 2,243 articles in PubMed using the terms "high dose vitamin D," "single dose vitamin D," "bolus vitamin D," or "annual dose vitamin D." Review articles, cross-sectional studies, non-human studies, responses to other articles, and non-English articles were excluded. Manuscripts were also excluded if the study: (1) did not use oral cholecalciferol or ergocalciferol, (2) used vitamin D analogs, (3) enrolled participants under age 18 years, (4) administered doses 1 dose per year. References of eligible manuscripts and the Cochrane databases were also searched. Two independent reviewers identified eligible manuscripts, and a third reviewer evaluated disagreements. Thirty manuscripts were selected using these criteria.

Results

Large, single doses of vitamin D consistently increased serum/plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentrations in several vitamin D-sufficient and -deficient populations. Vitamin D3 doses ≥300,000 IU provided optimal changes in serum/plasma 25(OH)D and parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations. Vitamin D supplementation also impacted bone health and extraskeletal endpoints.

Conclusion

This review recommends that vitamin D3 be used for supplementation over vitamin D2 and concludes that single vitamin D3 doses ≥300,000 IU are most effective at improving vitamin D status and suppressing PTH concentrations for up to 3 months. Lower doses, however, may be sufficient in certain populations. Vitamin D doses >500,000 IU should be used judiciously in order to minimize adverse events.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.