Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2015

Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of omega 3 fatty acids for the treatment of diabetic patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

Dasarathy S, Dasarathy J, Khiyami A, Yerian L, Hawkins C, Sargent R, McCullough AJ

Journal of clinical gastroenterology · 126 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
Cleveland Clinic
Gobierno
U.S. Public Health Service
Gobierno
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Gobierno
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Gobierno
NIDDK NIH HHS
Gobierno
NCATS NIH HHS
Gobierno
PHS HHS
Subvenciones
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1-TR-000439); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK83414); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01 DK061732); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01-DK-083414); U.S. Public Health Service (U01061732)

Según 7 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2014-02-28 · J Clin Gastroenterol · vol. 49 · número 2 · págs. 137–144
Editorial
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citado
163 citas · más que el 99% de estudios similares · 13.0× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
63 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
Áreas de investigación
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment · Fatty Acid Research and Health · Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Palabras clave
nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, diabetes mellitus, omega-3 fatty acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, insulin resistance, hepatic steatosis, lobular inflammation, liver histopathology, dietary supplementation
MeSH
humans, diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, docosahexaenoic acids, eicosapentaenoic acid, capsules, biopsy, treatment outcome, drug therapy, combination, administration, oral, prospective studies, feasibility studies, pilot projects, double-blind method, time factors, adult, middle aged, ohio, female, male, intention to treat analysis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, biomarkers

7 autores

  • Srinivasan Dasarathy🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaCleveland Clinic; MetroHealth Medical Center
  • Jaividhya Dasarathy
  • Amer Khiyami🇺🇸MetroHealth Medical Center
  • Lisa M. Yerian🇺🇸Cleveland Clinic
  • Carol Hawkins
  • Ruth Sargent · autor de correspondencia
  • Arthur J. McCullough · autor de correspondencia

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is common and severe in patients with diabetes mellitus. Although, there are no effective treatments for NASH in diabetic patients, preliminary reports suggest that polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) may be beneficial in these patients.

Aim

A prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study (NCT 00323414) was performed in NASH patients with diabetes. Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00323414).

Subjects and methods

A total of 37 patients (50.6 ± 9.8 y) with well-controlled diabetes (HbA1C<8.5%) were randomized to receive either PUFA containing eicosapentaenoic acid (2160 mg) and docosahexaenoic acid (1440 mg) daily or an isocaloric, identical placebo containing corn oil for 48 weeks under CONSORT guidelines. Clinical, demographics, biochemical laboratory tests, body composition using DEXA, and liver biopsy were performed at randomization and at the end of treatment. Liver biopsy was scored by the NASH CRN criteria. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

Results

At inclusion, sex, age, body weight, biochemical tests, glucose control, and liver histology were similar in the 2 treatment groups. There was no change in liver enzymes, body weight, or body composition during the study in either group. At the end of the treatment, hepatic steatosis and the activity score improved (P<0.05) and lobular inflammation worsened (P<0.001) with placebo but was unchanged with PUFA. At the end of the treatment, insulin resistance (serum glucose and HOMA) worsened with PUFA but not placebo.

Conclusions

PUFA provided no benefit over placebo in NASH patients with diabetes. The effects of PUFA on histology and insulin resistance were inferior to placebo. These data provide no support for PUFA supplements in NASH.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.