Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2015Financiación no declarada

Comparison of the effects of electrical stimulation and cold-water immersion on muscle soreness after resistance exercise

Jajtner AR, Hoffman JR, Gonzalez AM, Worts PR, Fragala MS, Stout JR

Journal of sport rehabilitation · 21 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2014-03-12 · J Sport Rehabil · vol. 24 · número 2 · págs. 99–108
Editorial
Human Kinetics
Citado
37 citas · más que el 92% de estudios similares · 3.4× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
28 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
Áreas de investigación
Exercise and Physiological Responses · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology · Sports Performance and Training
Palabras clave
Squat, Medicine, Context (archaeology), Resistance training, Stimulation, Physical therapy, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Internal medicine
MeSH
humans, water, immersion, electric stimulation, recovery of function, adult, male, cold temperature, resistance training, young adult, myalgia, outcome assessment, health care

6 autores

  • Adam R. Jajtner🇺🇸University of Central Florida
  • Jay R. Hoffman
  • Adam M. Gonzalez
  • Phillip R. Worts
  • Maren Susan Fragala
  • Jeffrey R. Stout

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Context

Resistance training is a common form of exercise for competitive and recreational athletes. Enhancing recovery from resistance training may improve the muscle-remodeling processes, stimulating a faster return to peak performance.

Objective

To examine the effects of 2 different recovery modalities, neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and cold-water immersion (CWI), on performance and biochemical and ultrasonographic measures.

Participants

Thirty resistance-trained men (23.1 ± 2.9 y, 175.2 ± 7.1 cm, 82.1 ± 8.4 kg) were randomly assigned to NMES, CWI, or control (CON).

Design and setting

All participants completed a high-volume lower-body resistance-training workout on d 1 and returned to the human performance laboratory 24 (24H) and 48 h (48 H) postexercise for follow-up testing.

Measures

Blood samples were obtained preexercise (PRE) and immediately (IP), 30 min (30 P), 24 h (24H), and 48 h (48 H) post. Subjects were examined for performance changes in the squat exercise (total repetitions and average power per repetition), biomarkers of inflammation, and changes in cross-sectional area and echo intensity (EI) of the rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis muscles.

Results

No differences between groups were observed in the number of repetitions (P = .250; power: P = .663). Inferential-based analysis indicated that increases in C-reactive protein concentrations were likely increased by a greater magnitude after CWI compared with CON, while NMES possibly decreased more than CON from IP to 24H. Increases in interleukin-10 concentrations between IP and 30 P were likely greater in CWI than NMES but not different from CON. Inferential-based analysis of RF EI indicated a likely decrease for CWI between IP and 48 H. No other differences between groups were noted in any other muscle-architecture measures.

Conclusions

Results indicated that CWI induced greater increases in pro- and anti-inflammatory markers, while decreasing RF EI, suggesting that CWI may be effective in enhancing short-term muscle recovery after high-volume bouts of resistance exercise.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.