Effectiveness of music therapy: a summary of systematic reviews based on randomized controlled trials of music interventions
Kamioka H, Tsutani K, Yamada M, Park H, Okuizumi H, Tsuruoka K, Honda T, Okada S, Park SJ, Kitayuguchi J, Abe T, Handa S, Oshio T, Mutoh Y
Patient preference and adherence · 78 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Gobierno
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Según 1 financiador declarado.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2014-05-01 · Patient Prefer Adherence · vol. 8 · pág. 727
- Editorial
- Dove Medical Press
- Citado
- 181 citas · más que el 82% de estudios similares · 1.8× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 60 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY-NC
- Áreas de investigación
- Music Therapy and Health · Neuroscience and Music Perception · Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Palabras clave
- Medicine, CINAHL, Music therapy, Randomized controlled trial, Systematic review, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Psychological intervention, Quality of life (healthcare), Physical therapy, Psychiatry, Internal medicine, Nursing
14 autores
- Hiroharu Kamioka🇯🇵Tokyo University of Agriculture
- Yoshiteru Mutoh🇯🇵Nippon Sport Science University
- Kiichiro Tsutani🇮🇪🇯🇵Department of Health; The University of Tokyo
- Minoru Yamada🇯🇵Kyoto University
- Hyuntae Park🇯🇵National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology
- Hiroyasu Okuizumi
- Koki Tsuruoka🇯🇵Japan College of Social Work
- Takuya Honda🇯🇵Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
- S Okada🇯🇵Physical Education and Medicine Research Foundation
- Sangjun Park🇯🇵Physical Education and Medicine Research Foundation
- Jun Kityuguchi
- Takafumi Abe
- Shuichi Handa
- Takuya Oshio
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Objective
The objective of this review was to summarize evidence for the effectiveness of music therapy (MT) and to assess the quality of systematic reviews (SRs) based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Study design
An SR of SRs based on RCTs.
Methods
Studies were eligible if they were RCTs. Studies included were those with at least one treatment group in which MT was applied. We searched the following databases from 1995 to October 1, 2012: MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Web of Science, Global Health Library, and Ichushi-Web. We also searched all Cochrane Database and Campbell Systematic Reviews up to October 1, 2012. Based on the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, we identified a disease targeted for each article.
Results
Twenty-one studies met all inclusion criteria. This study included 16 Cochrane reviews. As a whole, the quality of the articles was very good. Eight studies were about "Mental and behavioural disorders (F00-99)"; there were two studies on "Diseases of the nervous system (G00-99)" and "Diseases of the respiratory system (J00-99)"; and there was one study each for "Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases (E00-90)", "Diseases of the circulatory system (I00-99)", and "Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium (O60)". MT treatment improved the following: global and social functioning in schizophrenia and/or serious mental disorders, gait and related activities in Parkinson's disease, depressive symptoms, and sleep quality.
Conclusion
THIS COMPREHENSIVE SUMMARY OF SRS DEMONSTRATED THAT MT TREATMENT IMPROVED THE FOLLOWING: global and social functioning in schizophrenia and/or serious mental disorders, gait and related activities in Parkinson's disease, depressive symptoms, and sleep quality. MT may have the potential for improving other diseases, but there is not enough evidence at present. Most importantly, no specific adverse effect or harmful phenomenon occurred in any of the studies, and MT was well tolerated by almost all patients.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.