Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2014Financiación no declarada

Acute effects of low-level laser therapy on physiologic and electromyographic responses to the cardiopulmonary exercise testing in healthy untrained adults

da Silva Alves MA, Pinfildi CE, Neto LN, Lourenço RP, de Azevedo PH, Dourado VZ

Lasers in medical science · 33 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2014-06-12 · Lasers Med Sci · vol. 29 · número 6 · págs. 1945–1951
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
47 citas · más que el 88% de estudios similares · 2.6× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
30 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology · Sports Performance and Training
Palabras clave
low-level laser therapy, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, exercise performance, oxygen consumption, cardiovascular efficiency, muscle fatigue, untrained individuals, quadriceps, gastrocnemius, 850 nm laser
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, cardiovascular system, humans, exercise test, electromyography, exercise, cross-over studies, double-blind method, muscle fatigue, adolescent, adult, female, male, quadriceps muscle, young adult, healthy volunteers, low-level light therapy

6 autores

  • Mariana Agnes da Silva Alves🇧🇷Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Carlos Eduardo Pinfildi🇧🇷Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Luiz Nilsen Neto🇧🇷Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Rebeca Palomo Lourenço🇧🇷Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Paulo Henrique Silva Marques de Azevedo🇧🇷Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Victor Zuniga Dourado🇧🇷 · autor de correspondenciaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Despite the positive effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on muscle fatigue before exercises using a single muscle group, the acute effects of LLLT on performance in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) are poorly understood. We aimed to assess the acute effects of LLLT on physiologic and electromyographic responses to the CPET in healthy adults. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial was performed with 18 untrained participants (nine males, 22 ± 2 years). We applied LLLT or placebo on quadriceps and gastrocnemius 10 min before two rapidly incremental CPETs randomly performed in alternate days on a cycle ergometer. Participants received LLLT using a multidiode cluster, 20 s/site (850 nm, 100 mW/diode, 14 J/site). Physiological responses to the CPET were continuously monitored using a gas analyzer. The electromyographic fatigue threshold (EMGth) was assessed through surface electrodes on vastus lateralis. The root mean square (RMS) was plotted every 5 s against the exercise intensity, and its breakpoint values throughout the CPET was identified as EMGth. Compared to placebo, the LLLT significantly increased peak O2 uptake (V'O2 33 ± 10 vs. 31 ± 9 mL/min/kg). We observed a shallower slope of the Δheart rate/ΔV'O2 during the CPET after LLLT compared to placebo, i.e., increased cardiovascular efficiency (56 ± 24 vs. 66 ± 30 bpm/L/min). There were no LLLT-related changes in EMGth. The LLLT acutely increases exercise performance in healthy untrained adults probably due to increased O2 extraction by peripheral muscles without causing a significant impact on muscle fatigue.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.