Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2014Financiación no declarada

Creatine for Parkinson's disease

Xiao Y, Luo M, Luo H, Wang J

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 10 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2014-06-17 · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · vol. 2014 · número 6 · pág. CD009646
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
18 citas · más que el 77% de estudios similares · 1.2× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
30 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
Áreas de investigación
Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments · Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects · Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Palabras clave
creatine, Parkinson's disease, mitochondrial dysfunction, adjuvant therapy, motor function, activities of daily living, quality of life, gastrointestinal adverse effects, neurodegeneration
MeSH
humans, parkinson disease, creatine, neuroprotective agents, activities of daily living, quality of life, randomized controlled trials as topic

4 autores

  • Yousheng Xiao🇨🇳Guangxi Medical University; First Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University
  • Man Luo🇨🇳Guangxi Medical University; First Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University
  • Hongye Luo🇨🇳Guangxi Medical University
  • Jin Wang🇨🇳Guangxi Medical University; First Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Parkinson's disease is one of the most common neurodegenerative disorders and mitochondrial dysfunction plays an important role in its pathogenesis. Creatine is effective in improving mitochondrial function. It may therefore be useful for slowing the progression of Parkinson's disease.

Objectives

To assess the efficacy and safety of creatine used alone or as an adjuvant treatment for Parkinson's disease.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Movement Disorders Group Trials Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2013, November Issue 4), MEDLINE (January 1966 to 10 November 2013), EMBASE (1974 to 10 November 2013) and two Chinese databases. We searched ongoing trials registers and conference proceedings, checked reference lists and contacted authors of included trials.

Selection criteria

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing creatine versus placebo for Parkinson's disease.

Data collection and analysis

Two review authors independently selected the trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data.

Main results

We included two RCTs with a total of 194 patients. Both trials compared creatine with placebo for Parkinson's disease and both had methodological limitations. There was no clear evidence of an effect on motor function (MD -0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.39 to 3.88, low quality evidence), activities of daily living (MD 0.37; 95% CI -1.28 to 2.02, low quality evidence) or quality of life after one or two years of treatment. One trial reported serious adverse events that were not attributed to creatine. Also, one trial observed higher rates of gastrointestinal effects at two years follow-up.

Authors' conclusions

The evidence base on the effects of creatine in Parkinson's disease is limited by risk of bias, small sample sizes and short duration of the eligible trials. It does not provide a reliable basis on which treatment decisions can be made. Future well-designed RCTs with larger sample size and long-term follow-up are needed to assess creatine for Parkinson's disease.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.