The effect of low level laser therapy on the rate of tooth movement and pain perception during canine retraction
Heravi F, Moradi A, Ahrari F
Oral health and dental management · 52 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo clínico controlado (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2014-06-01 · Oral Health Dent Manag · vol. 13 · número 2 · págs. 183–8
- Editorial
- National Institutes of Health
- Citado
- 75 citas · más que el 96% de estudios similares · 5.7× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 35 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
- Palabras clave
- Placebo, Medicine, Premolar, Dentistry, Laser therapy, Degree (music), Pain perception, Orthodontics, Low level laser therapy, Laser, Physical therapy, Molar
3 autores
- Farzin Heravi🇮🇷Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
- Amir Moradi
- Farzaneh Ahrari
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Aims
This study investigated the effect of an 810 nm gallium-aluminum-arsenide (Ga-Al-As) laser on tooth movement velocity and pain perception during canine retraction in orthodontic patients.
Methods
This single blind study included 20 patients requiring upper first premolar extraction on both sides. One half of the upper arch was irradiated with a GaAlAs laser (810 nm, 200 mW, 10 points, 21.4 J/cm2/point) and the other half served as the placebo group. Irradiation was performed just after loading canine retraction forces and on days 3, 7, 11 15 over the first month. At the 28th day, the coil spring was adjusted and the same protocol was continued. The extension of tooth movement and the degree of mesiodistal inclination of canines were measured on the study models prepared at 0, 28 and 56 days. The patients were also asked to bite on plastic blocks to examine the degree of pain perceived on canines at both sides.
Results
There was no significant difference either in the speed of canine movement or in its degree of mesiodistal inclination between the laser and placebo sides. The pain perception did not differ significantly between the two groups at any of the treatment appointments.
Conclusion
Low level laser therapy (LLLT), with the parameter settings used in this study, did not affect canine movement velocity and its degree of mesiodistal inclination and did not influence pain perceived by the patients.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.