Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2014Financiación no declarada

Pressure pain sensitivity changes after use of shock-absorbing insoles among young soccer players training on artificial turf: a randomized controlled trial

Madeleine P, Hoej BP, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Rathleff MS, Kaalund S

The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy · 11 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2014-07-17 · J Orthop Sports Phys Ther · vol. 44 · número 8 · págs. 587–594
Editorial
American Physical Therapy Association
Citado
19 citas · más que el 82% de estudios similares · 1.7× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
32 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Sports injuries and prevention · Tendon Structure and Treatment · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Palabras clave
Randomized controlled trial, Shock (circulatory), Sensitivity (control systems), Physical therapy, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Medicine, Surgery, Engineering, Internal medicine
MeSH
foot, leg, humans, low back pain, prospective studies, single-blind method, pain threshold, pressure, physical education and training, soccer, shoes, adolescent, pain perception

5 autores

  • Pascal Madeleine🇩🇰Aalborg University
  • Brian P. Hoej🇩🇰Aalborg University
  • César Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas
  • Michael Skovdal Rathleff🇩🇰Aalborg University Hospital
  • Søren Kaalund

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Study design

Prospective, randomized, controlled single-blind intervention trial.

Objectives

Shock-absorbing insoles (SAIs), compared with usual insoles, were hypothesized to result in larger increases in pressure pain threshold (PPT) after 3 weeks of use.

Background

Shock-absorbing insoles can decrease self-reported pain among young soccer players training on artificial turf. However, nothing is known about the underlying changes in pain sensitivity assessed by PPT. Methods Seventy-five players were included from the youth teams of under 15, under 17, and under 19 years of age, playing for the Aalborg Boldspilklub (AaB) professional sports club. After a randomization stratified by team and age, players were divided into 2 groups, one that received SAIs and a control group that used their usual insoles. Assessments were made in both groups after 3 weeks of training on artificial turf (baseline) and 3 weeks later (follow-up). The primary outcome was change in PPTs from baseline to follow-up, with PPTs measured over 13 locations on the plantar surface of the foot, leg, and low back of the nonpreferred kicking leg.

Results

A significantly larger increase was found in PPTs from baseline to follow-up for the SAI group compared with the control group (mean difference, 62 kPa; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 40, 85 kPa). The PPTs increased significantly more among the SAI group compared with the control group (P<.05) for the abductor digiti minimi (mean difference, 82 kPa; 95% CI: 6, 157 kPa), tibialis anterior (mean difference, 125 kPa; 95% CI: 20, 230 kPa), medial gastrocnemius (mean difference, 83 kPa; 95% CI: -6, 171 kPa), and erector spinae (mean difference, 86 kPa; 95% CI: -17, 188 kPa).

Conclusion

The use of SAIs resulted in increased PPTs after 3 weeks of training on artificial turf compared with controls, suggesting a protective role of SAIs in pressure sensitivity and pain perception.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.