Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2014Financiación no declarada

The effects of vitamin D on skeletal muscle strength, muscle mass, and muscle power: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Beaudart C, Buckinx F, Rabenda V, Gillain S, Cavalier E, Slomian J, Petermans J, Reginster JY, Bruyère O

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 468 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2014-07-17 · J Clin Endocrinol Metab · vol. 99 · número 11 · págs. 4336–4345
Editorial
Oxford University Press
Citado
674 citas · más que el 99% de estudios similares · 6.3× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
64 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Vitamin D Research Studies · Nutrition and Health in Aging · Nutrition and Health Studies
Palabras clave
vitamin D supplementation, skeletal muscle strength, muscle mass, muscle power, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, calcium supplementation, older adults, muscle function
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, humans, vitamin d, dietary supplements, middle aged, muscle strength, randomized controlled trials as topic

9 autores

  • Charlotte Beaudart🇧🇪 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Liège
  • Fanny Buckinx🇧🇪University of Liège
  • Véronique Rabenda🇧🇪University of Liège
  • Sophie Gillain🇧🇪Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège
  • Etienne Cavalier🇧🇪University of Liège
  • Justine Slomian🇧🇪University of Liège
  • Jean Pétermans🇧🇪Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège
  • Jean‐Yves Reginster🇧🇪University of Liège; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège
  • Olivier Bruyère🇧🇪University of Liège

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Context

There is growing evidence that vitamin D plays a role on several tissues including skeletal muscle.

Objective

The aim was to summarize with a meta-analysis, the effects of vitamin D supplementation on muscle function.

Data sources

A systematic research of randomized controlled trials, performed between 1966 and January 2014 has been conducted on Medline, Cochrane Database of Systematics Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled and completed by a manual review of the literature and congressional abstracts.

Study selection

All forms and doses of vitamin D supplementation, with or without calcium supplementation, compared with placebo or control were included. Out of the 225 potentially relevant articles, 30 randomized controlled trials involving 5615 individuals (mean age: 61.1 years) met the inclusion criteria.

Data extraction

Data were extracted by two independent reviewers.

Data synthesis

Results revealed a small but significant positive effect of vitamin D supplementation on global muscle strength with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.17 (P = .02). No significant effect was found on muscle mass (SMD 0.058; P = .52) or muscle power (SMD 0.057; P = .657). Results on muscle strength were significantly more important with people who presented a 25-hydroxyvitamin D level <30 nmol/L. Supplementation seems also more effective on people aged 65 years or older compared to younger subjects (SMD 0.25; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.48 vs SMD 0.03; 95% CI -0.08 to 0.14).

Conclusions

Vitamin D supplementation has a small positive impact on muscle strength, but additional studies are needed to define optimal treatment modalities, including dose, mode of administration, and duration.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.