Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2014Financiación no declarada

Serum vitamin D levels in relation to schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Valipour G, Saneei P, Esmaillzadeh A

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 99 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2014-07-22 · J Clin Endocrinol Metab · vol. 99 · número 10 · págs. 3863–3872
Editorial
Oxford University Press
Citado
149 citas · más que el 88% de estudios similares · 2.2× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
44 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Vitamin D Research Studies · Schizophrenia research and treatment · Mental Health and Psychiatry
Palabras clave
vitamin D deficiency, schizophrenia, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D status, prevalence of vitamin D deficiency
MeSH
humans, vitamin d deficiency, vitamin d, prevalence, schizophrenia, observational studies as topic

3 autores

  • Ghazaleh Valipour🇮🇷Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
  • Parvane Saneei🇮🇷Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
  • Ahmad Esmaillzadeh🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaIsfahan University of Medical Sciences

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Introduction

Although several observational studies have investigated the association between vitamin D status and schizophrenia, we are aware of no comprehensive meta-analysis in this regard.

Objective

We aimed to conduct a systematic review and a meta-analysis of observational studies to summarize the available data on the association between serum vitamin D levels and schizophrenia.

Methods

A systematic research on all published articles until October 2013 was conducted in PubMed, ISI (Web of science), SCOPUS, and Google Scholar. All observational studies that had measured serum vitamin D levels in schizophrenic patients were included in the systematic review. After considering exclusion criteria, we had 19 studies for the systematic review that were included in three separate meta-analyses: 1) a meta-analysis on mean levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] (n = 13); 2) a meta-analysis on the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (n = 8); 3) a meta-analysis on odds ratios (n = 8).

Results

Findings from a meta-analysis on means revealed that the overall mean difference in serum 25(OH)D levels between schizophrenic patients and control participants was -5.91 ng/mL [95% confidence interval (CI) -10.68, -1.14]. Subgroup analyses based on study design, the patient's hospitalization status, study quality, and study location did not explain between-study heterogeneity; however, type of biomarker assessed [25-hydroxyvitamin D3 vs 25-hydroxyvitamin D (D2 & D3)] could account for some degree of heterogeneity. RESULTS from the meta-analysis on the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency indicated that the overall prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in schizophrenic patients was 65.3% (95% CI 46.4%-84.2%). Findings from the meta-analysis on odds ratios indicated that vitamin D-deficient persons were 2.16 times (95% CI 1.32, 3.56) more likely to have schizophrenia than those with vitamin D sufficiency. No evidence of heterogeneity was detected.

Conclusion

We found a strong association between vitamin D deficiency and schizophrenia. However, randomized clinical trials are required to confirm our findings.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.