Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2014Financiación no declarada

Caffeine and performance over consecutive days of simulated competition

Stadheim HK, Spencer M, Olsen R, Jensen J

Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 30 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2014-02-06 · Med Sci Sports Exerc · vol. 46 · número 9 · págs. 1787–1796
Editorial
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citado
42 citas · más que el 81% de estudios similares · 1.5× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
42 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio) · OTHER-OA
Áreas de investigación
Coffee research and impacts · Sports Performance and Training · Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Palabras clave
caffeine, caffeine dose, cross-country skiing, endurance performance, muscle damage, creatine kinase, epinephrine, blood lactate, heart rate, myalgia, placebo
MeSH
humans, epinephrine, lactic acid, caffeine, creatine kinase, exercise test, cross-over studies, double-blind method, competitive behavior, placebo effect, oxygen consumption, heart rate, running, time factors, skiing, male, athletic performance, young adult, performance-enhancing substances, myalgia

4 autores

  • Hans Kristian Stadheim🇳🇴National Institute of Occupational Health; Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
  • Matthew D. Spencer🇳🇴Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
  • Raymond Olsen🇳🇴National Institute of Occupational Health
  • Jørgen Jensen🇳🇴Norwegian School of Sport Sciences

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Purpose

Performance improvements after caffeine (CAF) ingestion are well documented when using a 1-d protocol. In numerous competitions such as the Tour de France, Tour de Ski, world championships, and National College Athletic Association championships, athletes compete for several days in a row. To date, no studies have investigated the effects of CAF when competing for consecutive days in a row. This study aimed to investigate the effects of placebo (PLA) and two different CAF doses (3 and 4.5 mg·kg body mass) on performance in a 10-min all-out, cross-country, double poling ergometer test (C-PT) 2 d in a row.

Method

Eight highly trained male cross-country skiers (V˙O2max-run, 78.5 ± 1.6 mL·kg·min) participated in the study, which was a randomized, double-blind, PLA-controlled, crossover design. Performance was assessed as distance covered during a 10-min all-out C-PT. Oral ingestion of CAF or PLA was consumed 75 min before the all-out C-PT.

Results

Poling distance was improved after CAF ingestions compared with that after PLA on both days. The improvements on day 1 were 4.0% (90% confidence limits, ±3.3) and 4.0% ± 2.9% for both CAF doses, respectively (P < 0.05), whereas improvements on day 2 were 5.0% ± 3.6% and 5.1% ± 2.8% for CAF3 and CAF4.5, respectively, compared with those for PLA. Improved performance was associated with increased HR, adrenaline concentration, blood lactate concentration, and V˙O2 consumption after CAF ingestion. Furthermore, performance was elevated despite higher creatine kinase concentration and muscular pain at arrival on day 2 for both CAF doses.

Conclusions

Both CAF doses improved performance in the 10-min all-out C-PT compared with PLA over two consecutive days. Therefore, CAF seems useful for athletes competing over consecutive days despite higher muscle damage occurring after enhanced performance on the first day.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.