Red and processed meat intake and risk of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis
Li F, An S, Hou L, Chen P, Lei C, Tan W
International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 32 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2014-01-01 · Int J Clin Exp Med · vol. 7 · número 8 · págs. 2100–10
- Editorial
- National Institutes of Health
- Citado
- 37 citas · más que el 64% de estudios similares · 0.9× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 30 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
- Áreas de investigación
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
- Palabras clave
- Red meat, Medicine, Bladder cancer, Processed meat, Meta-analysis, Cancer, Relative risk, Environmental health, Food science, Internal medicine, Confidence interval, Pathology, Biology
6 autores
- Fei Ran Li🇨🇳Southern Medical University
- Shengli An🇨🇳Southern Medical University
- Lina Hou🇨🇳Southern Medical University
- Pengliang Chen🇨🇳Southern Medical University
- Chengyong Lei🇨🇳Southern Medical University
- Wanlong Tan🇨🇳Southern Medical University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Findings from epidemiologic studies concerning red and processed meat intake and bladder cancer risk remain conflicting. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to examine the associations of red and processed meat intake with bladder cancer. Eligible studies published up to May 2014 were retrieved via both computer searches and review of references. Finally, we identified 14 studies on red meat (involving 9,084 cases) and 11 studies on processed meat (7,562 cases) involving up to 1,558,848 individuals. Random-effects models were used to estimate summary relative risk estimates (SRRE) based on high vs. low intake, and heterogeneity between study results was explored through stratified analyses on the basis of red/processed meat category, gender, study design and geographical region. Overall, the SRRE for all studies regarding red meat intake was 1.15 (95% CI: 0.97-1.36). Significant positive association was observed between processed meat consumption and bladder cancer (SRRE = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.04-1.43). Interestingly, increased by 25% and 33% risk of bladder cancer were observed for red meat and processed meat intake respectively in populations from the American continent. In conclusion, our fi ndings showed that there was an absence of an association between red meat intake and bladder cancer, but suggested that high consumption of processed meat probably correlated with rising risk of bladder cancer. In addition, positive relationships were observed regarding people intake of red and processed meat in the American continent. These findings need to be confirmed in future research.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.