Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2015Financiación no declarada

Low-level laser therapy for orthodontic pain: a systematic review

Li FJ, Zhang JY, Zeng XT, Guo Y

Lasers in medical science · 53 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2014-09-25 · Lasers Med Sci · vol. 30 · número 6 · págs. 1789–1803
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
75 citas · más que el 65% de estudios similares · 0.9× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
50 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Palabras clave
low-level laser therapy, orthodontic pain, pain management, pain scores
MeSH
humans, pain, placebos, lasers, adolescent, adult, child, female, male, young adult, pain management, low-level light therapy

4 autores

  • Fang-bo Li🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaWuhan University
  • J. Y. Zhang🇨🇳Wuhan University
  • Xian‐Tao Zeng🇨🇳Hubei University of Medicine; Taihe Hospital
  • Ying Guo🇨🇳Wuhan University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

This review aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of different lasers management on orthodontic pain. Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2014) and MEDLINE (1966-2014.7) were searched to collect randomized controlled trials on lasers for orthodontic pain. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were systematically evaluated. The Cochrane Collaboration tools RevMan5.1.7 and GRADEpro 3.6 were used in this systematic review and meta-analysis. As a result, 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying on low-level laser therapy (LLLT) for orthodontic pain control were included. Meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment were implemented using RevMan5.1.7, and level of evidence assessments was measured by GRADEpro 3.6. In the outcome of the score of the most painful day, the comparison of laser versus placebo (pain associated with tooth movement) demonstrated that LLLT reduced the pain score significantly compared with placebo groups (MD = -4.39, 95% CI range -5.9--2.88, P < 0.00001). In the same way, the most painful day was significantly brought forward in laser versus control group (MD = -0.42, 95% CI range -0.74--0.10, P = 0.009). Furthermore, the outcome of the end of pain day showed a trend of pain termination earlier in laser versus control and placebo groups, but without statistical significance (MD = -1.37, 95% CI range -3.37-0.64, P = 0.18 and MD = -1.04, 95% CI range -4.22-2.15, P = 0.52). However, for the reason of downgrade factors, all the GRADE level of evidences of eight comparisons for three outcomes showed a very low quality. Therefore, for the methodological shortcomings and risk of bias of RCTs included, insufficient evidence was submitted to judge whether LLLT was effective in relieving orthodontic pain. Further and more perfect researches should be done in order to recommend LLLT as a routine method for orthodontic pain.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.