Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2014Financiación no declarada

Effect of high-dose vitamin D3 on hospital length of stay in critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency: the VITdAL-ICU randomized clinical trial

Amrein K, Schnedl C, Holl A, Riedl R, Christopher KB, Pachler C, Urbanic Purkart T, Waltensdorfer A, Münch A, Warnkross H, Stojakovic T, Bisping E, Toller W, Smolle KH, Berghold A, Pieber TR, Dobnig H

JAMA · 340 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2014-09-30 · JAMA · vol. 312 · número 15 · pág. 1520
Editorial
American Medical Association
Citado
493 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 29.4× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
29 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Vitamin D Research Studies · Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders · Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
Palabras clave
vitamin D3 supplementation, vitamin D deficiency, critically ill patients, length of hospital stay, ICU length of stay, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, in-hospital mortality, 6-month mortality, high-dose vitamin D, maintenance dosing, critically ill adults, nasogastric tube administration
MeSH
humans, vitamin d deficiency, critical illness, cholecalciferol, vitamins, length of stay, hospital mortality, double-blind method, aged, middle aged, intensive care units, female, male

17 autores

  • Karin Amrein🇦🇹 · autor de correspondenciaMedical University of Graz
  • Christian Schnedl🇦🇹Medical University of Graz
  • Alexander Höll🇦🇹Medical University of Graz
  • Regina Riedl🇦🇹Medical University of Graz
  • Kenneth B. Christopher🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • Christoph Pachler🇦🇹Medical University of Graz
  • Tadeja Urbanic Purkart🇦🇹Medical University of Graz
  • Andreas Waltensdorfer🇦🇹Medical University of Graz
  • Andreas Münch🇦🇹Medical University of Graz
  • Helga Warnkross🇦🇹Medical University of Graz
  • Tatjana Stojaković🇦🇹Medical University of Graz
  • Egbert Hubertus Bisping🇦🇹Medical University of Graz
  • Wolfgang G Toller🇦🇹Medical University of Graz
  • Karl‐Heinz Smolle🇦🇹Medical University of Graz
  • Andrea Berghold🇦🇹Medical University of Graz
  • Thomas Rudolf Pieber🇦🇹Medical University of Graz
  • Harald Dobnig🇦🇹Medical University of Graz

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Importance

Low vitamin D status is linked to increased mortality and morbidity in patients who are critically ill. It is unknown if this association is causal.

Objective

To investigate whether a vitamin D3 treatment regimen intended to restore and maintain normal vitamin D status over 6 months is of health benefit for patients in ICUs.

Design, setting, and participants

A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center trial, conducted from May 2010 through September 2012 at 5 ICUs that included a medical and surgical population of 492 critically ill adult white patients with vitamin D deficiency (≤20 ng/mL) assigned to receive either vitamin D3 (n = 249) or a placebo (n = 243).

Interventions

Vitamin D3 or placebo was given orally or via nasogastric tube once at a dose of 540,000 IU followed by monthly maintenance doses of 90,000 IU for 5 months.

Main outcomes and measures

The primary outcome was hospital length of stay. Secondary outcomes included, among others, length of ICU stay, the percentage of patients with 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels higher than 30 ng/mL at day 7, hospital mortality, and 6-month mortality. A predefined severe vitamin D deficiency (≤12 ng/mL) subgroup analysis was specified before data unblinding and analysis.

Results

A total of 475 patients were included in the final analysis (237 in the vitamin D3 group and 238 in the placebo group). The median (IQR) length of hospital stay was not significantly different between groups (20.1 days [IQR, 11.1-33.3] for vitamin D3 vs 19.3 days [IQR, 11.1-34.9] for placebo; P = .98). Hospital mortality and 6-month mortality were also not significantly different (hospital mortality: 28.3% [95% CI, 22.6%-34.5%] for vitamin D3 vs 35.3% [95% CI, 29.2%-41.7%] for placebo; hazard ratio [HR], 0.81 [95% CI, 0.58-1.11]; P = .18; 6-month mortality: 35.0% [95% CI, 29.0%-41.5%] for vitamin D3 vs 42.9% [95% CI, 36.5%-49.4%] for placebo; HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.58-1.04]; P = .09). For the severe vitamin D deficiency subgroup analysis (n = 200), length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the 2 study groups: 20.1 days (IQR, 12.9-39.1) for vitamin D3 vs 19.0 days (IQR, 11.6-33.8) for placebo. Hospital mortality was significantly lower with 28 deaths among 98 patients (28.6% [95% CI, 19.9%-38.6%]) for vitamin D3 compared with 47 deaths among 102 patients (46.1% [95% CI, 36.2%-56.2%]) for placebo (HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.35-0.90], P for interaction = .04), but not 6-month mortality (34.7% [95% CI, 25.4%-45.0%] for vitamin D3 vs 50.0% [95% CI, 39.9%-60.1%] for placebo; HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.39-0.93], P for interaction = .12).

Conclusions and relevance

Among critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency, administration of high-dose vitamin D3 compared with placebo did not reduce hospital length of stay, hospital mortality, or 6-month mortality. Lower hospital mortality was observed in the severe vitamin D deficiency subgroup, but this finding should be considered hypothesis generating and requires further study.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01130181.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.