Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2014Financiación no declaradaAcceso abierto

Monounsaturated fatty acids, olive oil and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Schwingshackl L, Hoffmann G

Lipids in health and disease · 287 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2014-10-01 · Lipids Health Dis · vol. 13 · número 1 · pág. 154
Editorial
BioMed Central
Citado
507 citas · más que el 94% de estudios similares · 3.8× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
73 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Edible Oils Quality and Analysis · Nutritional Studies and Diet
Palabras clave
Medicine, Meta-analysis, Hazard ratio, Stroke (engine), Internal medicine, Subgroup analysis, Relative risk, Cohort study, Clinical nutrition, Cohort, Lipidology, Lower risk, Cause of death, Clinical chemistry, Disease, Confidence interval
MeSH
humans, cardiovascular diseases, fatty acids, monounsaturated, plant oils, cardiovascular agents, administration, oral, risk factors, health status, diet, mediterranean, olive oil

2 autores

  • Lukas Schwingshackl🇦🇹 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Vienna; BOKU University
  • Georg E. HOFFMANN🇦🇹University of Vienna

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

The aim of the present meta-analysis of cohort studies was to focus on monounsaturated fat (MUFA) and cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular mortality as well as all-cause mortality, and to distinguish between the different dietary sources of MUFA.

Methods

Literature search was performed using the electronic databases PUBMED, and EMBASE until June 2nd, 2014. Study specific risk ratios and hazard ratios were pooled using a inverse variance random effect model.

Results

Thirty-two cohort studies (42 reports) including 841,211 subjects met the objectives and were included. The comparison of the top versus bottom third of the distribution of a combination of MUFA (of both plant and animal origin), olive oil, oleic acid, and MUFA:SFA ratio in each study resulted in a significant risk reduction for: all-cause mortality (RR: 0.89, 95% CI 0.83, 0.96, p = 0.001; I2 = 64%), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.88, 95% CI 0.80, 0.96, p = 0.004; I2 = 50%), cardiovascular events (RR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.86, 0.96, p = 0.001; I2 = 58%), and stroke (RR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.71, 0.97, p = 0.02; I2 = 70%). Following subgroup analyses, significant associations could only be found between higher intakes of olive oil and reduced risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and stroke, respectively. The MUFA subgroup analyses did not reveal any significant risk reduction.

Conclusion

The results indicate an overall risk reduction of all-cause mortality (11%), cardiovascular mortality (12%), cardiovascular events (9%), and stroke (17%) when comparing the top versus bottom third of MUFA, olive oil, oleic acid, and MUFA:SFA ratio. MUFA of mixed animal and vegetable sources per se did not yield any significant effects on these outcome parameters. However, only olive oil seems to be associated with reduced risk. Further research is necessary to evaluate specific sources of MUFA (i.e. plant vs. animal) and cardiovascular risk.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.