Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2015Financiación no declarada

The impact of music therapy versus music medicine on psychological outcomes and pain in cancer patients: a mixed methods study

Bradt J, Potvin N, Kesslick A, Shim M, Radl D, Schriver E, Gracely EJ, Komarnicky-Kocher LT

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 110 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2014-10-15 · Support Care Cancer · vol. 23 · número 5 · págs. 1261–1271
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
231 citas · más que el 99% de estudios similares · 12.4× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
28 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Music Therapy and Health · Cancer survivorship and care · Art Therapy and Mental Health
Palabras clave
music therapy, music medicine, cancer pain, psychological outcomes, mood, anxiety, relaxation, patient experience, symptom management, emotional expression, cancer patients
MeSH
humans, neoplasms, pain, music therapy, data collection, pilot projects, cross-over studies, emotions, affect, anxiety, mood disorders, music, adult, aged, aged, 80 and over, middle aged, female, male, pain management

8 autores

  • Joke Bradt🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaDrexel University
  • Noah Potvin🇺🇸Drexel University
  • Amy Kesslick🇺🇸Drexel University
  • Minjung Shim🇺🇸Drexel University
  • Donna M Radl🇺🇸Drexel University
  • Emily Schriver🇺🇸Drexel University
  • Edward J. Gracely🇺🇸Drexel University
  • Lydia T. Komarnicky-Kocher🇺🇸Drexel University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of music therapy (MT) versus music medicine (MM) interventions on psychological outcomes and pain in cancer patients and to enhance understanding of patients' experiences of these two types of music interventions.

Methods

This study employed a mixed methods intervention design in which qualitative data were embedded within a randomized cross-over trial. Thirty-one adult cancer patients participated in two sessions that involved interactive music making with a music therapist (MT) and two sessions in which they listened to pre-recorded music without the presence of a therapist (MM). Before and after each session, participants reported on their mood, anxiety, relaxation, and pain by means of visual analogue and numeric rating scales. Thirty participants completed an exit interview.

Results

The quantitative data suggest that both interventions were equally effective in enhancing target outcomes. However, 77.4 % of participants expressed a preference for MT sessions. The qualitative data indicate that music improves symptom management, embodies hope for survival, and helps connect to a pre-illness self, but may also access memories of loss and trauma. MT sessions helped participants tap into inner resources such as playfulness and creativity. Interactive music making also allowed for emotional expression. Some participants preferred the familiarity and predictability of listening to pre-recorded music.

Conclusions

The findings of this study advocate for the use of music in cancer care. Treatment benefits may depend on patient characteristics such as outlook on life and readiness to explore emotions related to the cancer experience.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.