Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2014

An alternative treatment for anxiety: a systematic review of human trial results reported for the Ayurvedic herb ashwagandha (Withania somnifera)

Pratte MA, Nanavati KB, Young V, Morley CP

Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 74 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
State University of New York
Gobierno
Health Resources and Services Administration
Gobierno
U.S. Public Health Service
Universidad u hospital
State University of New York Upstate Medical University
Gobierno
PHS HHS
Subvenciones
U.S. Public Health Service (D54 HP 05462)

Según 5 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2014-11-18 · J Altern Complement Med · vol. 20 · número 12 · págs. 901–908
Editorial
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Citado
143 citas · más que el 90% de estudios similares · 2.9× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
21 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
Áreas de investigación
Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants · Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions · Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Palabras clave
Medicine, Withania somnifera, Anxiety, Randomized controlled trial, Placebo, Traditional medicine, Alternative medicine, Naturopathy, CINAHL, Physical therapy, Psychiatry, Psychological intervention, Internal medicine
MeSH
humans, plant extracts, medicine, ayurvedic, phytotherapy, anxiety, anxiety disorders, psychotherapy

4 autores

  • Morgan A. Pratte🇺🇸SUNY Upstate Medical University; Yale University
  • Kaushal B. Nanavati🇺🇸SUNY Upstate Medical University
  • Virginia B. Young🇺🇸SUNY Upstate Medical University
  • Christopher P. Morley🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaSUNY Upstate Medical University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

To assess existing reported human trials of Withania somnifera (WS; common name, ashwagandha) for the treatment of anxiety.

Design

Systematic review of the literature, with searches conducted in PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and Google Scholar by a medical librarian. Additionally, the reference lists of studies identified in these databases were searched by a research assistant, and queries were conducted in the AYUSH Research Portal. Search terms included "ashwagandha," "Withania somnifera," and terms related to anxiety and stress. Inclusion criteria were human randomized controlled trials with a treatment arm that included WS as a remedy for anxiety or stress. The study team members applied inclusion criteria while screening the records by abstract review.

Intervention

Treatment with any regimen of WS.

Outcome measures

Number and results of studies identified in the review.

Results

Sixty-two abstracts were screened; five human trials met inclusion criteria. Three studies compared several dosage levels of WS extract with placebos using versions of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale, with two demonstrating significant benefit of WS versus placebo, and the third demonstrating beneficial effects that approached but did not achieve significance (p=0.05). A fourth study compared naturopathic care with WS versus psychotherapy by using Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) scores as an outcome; BAI scores decreased by 56.5% in the WS group and decreased 30.5% for psychotherapy (p<0.0001). A fifth study measured changes in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) scores in WS group versus placebo; there was a 44.0% reduction in PSS scores in the WS group and a 5.5% reduction in the placebo group (p<0.0001). All studies exhibited unclear or high risk of bias, and heterogenous design and reporting prevented the possibility of meta-analysis.

Conclusions

All five studies concluded that WS intervention resulted in greater score improvements (significantly in most cases) than placebo in outcomes on anxiety or stress scales. Current evidence should be received with caution because of an assortment of study methods and cases of potential bias.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.