The influence of an artificial playing surface on injury risk and perceptions of muscle soreness in elite Rugby Union
Williams S, Trewartha G, Kemp SP, Michell R, Stokes KA
Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 20 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Universidad u hospital
- University of Bath
Según 1 financiador declarado.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2015-01-21 · Scand J Med Sci Sports · vol. 26 · número 1 · págs. 101–108
- Editorial
- Wiley
- Citado
- 31 citas · más que el 82% de estudios similares · 1.7× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 30 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio) · OTHER-OA
- Áreas de investigación
- Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Palabras clave
- Confidence interval, Medicine, Prospective cohort study, Elite, Bench press, Physical therapy, Internal medicine
- MeSH
- muscles, skin, humans, poaceae, athletic injuries, injury severity score, risk assessment, prospective studies, pilot projects, perception, football, floors and floorcoverings, england, myalgia
5 autores
- Sean M. Williams🇬🇧 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Bath
- Grant Trewartha🇬🇧University of Bath
- Simon P T Kemp🇬🇧The Football Association
- Robert Hall Michell🇬🇧University of Bath
- Keith Stokes🇬🇧University of Bath
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
This prospective cohort study investigated the influence of an artificial playing surface on injury risk and perceptions of muscle soreness in elite English Premiership Rugby Union players. Time loss (from 39.5 matches) and abrasion (from 27 matches) injury risk was compared between matches played on artificial turf and natural grass. Muscle soreness was reported over the 4 days following one match played on each surface by 95 visiting players (i.e., normally play on natural grass surfaces). There was a likely trivial difference in the overall injury burden relating to time-loss injuries between playing surfaces [rate ratio = 1.01, 90% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-1.38]. Abrasions were substantially more common on artificial turf (rate ratio = 7.92, 90% CI: 4.39-14.28), although the majority of these were minor and only two resulted in any reported time loss. Muscle soreness was consistently higher over the 4 days following a match on artificial turf in comparison with natural grass, although the magnitude of this effect was small (effect sizes ranging from 0.26 to 0.40). These results suggest that overall injury risk is similar for the two playing surfaces, but further surveillance is required before inferences regarding specific injury diagnoses and smaller differences in overall injury risk can be made.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.