A systematic review of the effects of upper body warm-up on performance and injury
McCrary JM, Ackermann BJ, Halaki M
British journal of sports medicine · 74 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Gobierno
- Fulbright Australia
Según 1 financiador declarado.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2015-02-18 · Br J Sports Med · vol. 49 · número 14 · págs. 935–942
- Editorial
- BMJ
- Citado
- 135 citas · más que el 75% de estudios similares · 1.3× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 56 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY-NC
- Áreas de investigación
- Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics · Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Palabras clave
- Medicine, Physical medicine and rehabilitation
- MeSH
- muscle, skeletal, humans, athletic injuries, adult, female, male, muscle strength, randomized controlled trials as topic, athletic performance, warm-up exercise
3 autores
- J. Matt McCrary🇦🇺The University of Sydney
- Bronwen Jane Ackermann🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaThe University of Sydney
- Mark Halaki🇦🇺The University of Sydney
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Purpose
This systematic review was conducted to identify the impact of upper body warm-up on performance and injury prevention outcomes.
Methods
Web of Science, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO and Cochrane databases were searched using terms related to upper extremity warm-up. Inclusion criteria were English language randomised controlled trials from peer-reviewed journals in which investigation of upper body warm-up on performance and injury prevention outcomes was a primary aim. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality using the PEDro scale. A wide variety of warm-up modes and outcomes precluded meta-analysis except for one group of studies. The majority of warm-ups were assessed as having 'positive', 'neutral', 'negative' or 'specific' effects on outcomes.
Results
Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria with 21 rated as having 'good' methodological quality. The studies investigated a total of 25 warm-up modes and 43 outcome factors that could be grouped into eight mode and performance outcome categories. No studies of upper body warm-up effects on injury prevention were discovered.
Conclusions
Strong research-based evidence was found for the following: high-load dynamic warm-ups enhance power and strength performance; warm-up swings with a standard weight baseball bat are most effective for enhancing bat speed; short-duration static stretching warm-up has no effect on power outcomes; and passive heating/cooling is a largely ineffective warm-up mode. A clear knowledge gap in upper body warm-up literature is the lack of investigation of injury prevention outcomes.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.