Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2015Financiación no declaradaAcceso abierto

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effects of caffeine and L-theanine both alone and in combination on cerebral blood flow, cognition and mood

Dodd FL, Kennedy DO, Riby LM, Haskell-Ramsay CF

Psychopharmacology · 65 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2015-03-11 · Psychopharmacology (Berl) · vol. 232 · número 14 · págs. 2563–2576
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
101 citas · más que el 98% de estudios similares · 8.6× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
72 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Coffee research and impacts · Tea Polyphenols and Effects · Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine
Palabras clave
Caffeine, Theanine, Placebo, Mood, Crossover study, Cerebral blood flow, Psychology, Pharmacology, Cognition, Anesthesia, Chemistry, Medicine, Clinical psychology, Psychiatry, Green tea, Food science
MeSH
humans, caffeine, glutamates, hemoglobins, oxyhemoglobins, central nervous system stimulants, spectroscopy, near-infrared, cross-over studies, double-blind method, affect, cognition, psychomotor performance, attention, reaction time, cerebrovascular circulation, vasoconstriction, adolescent, adult, female, male, hemodynamics, young adult

4 autores

  • Fiona L. Dodd🇬🇧Northumbria University
  • David Opare KENNEDY🇬🇧Northumbria University
  • Leigh M. Riby🇬🇧Northumbria University
  • Crystal F. Haskell‐Ramsay🇬🇧 · autor de correspondenciaNorthumbria University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Rationale

Evidence suggests interactive effects of the tea components caffeine and L-theanine on behaviour, yet no data exists exploring the impact of the two on cerebral blood flow (CBF).

Objectives

The current placebo-controlled, double-blind, counterbalanced, crossover study examined the effects of caffeine and L-theanine on CBF and extended previous cognitive and mood findings by using lower doses than previous studies of a similar methodology, which more closely reflect the ratios present in tea.

Methods

Twelve habitual consumers and 12 non-habitual consumers of caffeine each received 75 mg caffeine, 50 mg L-theanine, 75 mg caffeine plus 50 mg L-theanine, and placebo in a counterbalanced order across four separate visits. CBF was measured via near-infrared spectroscopy with cognition and mood assessed at baseline and 30 min post-dose. Salivary caffeine and peripheral haemodynamics were co-monitored.

Results

Caffeine reduced oxygenated haemoglobin (oxy-Hb), increased deoxygenated haemoglobin (deoxy-Hb), improved performance on attention tasks and increased overall mood ratings. Increases in deoxy-Hb following caffeine were more pronounced in non-consumers. Some evidence for increased deoxy-Hb remained when caffeine was combined with L-theanine, but this effect was attenuated and the effects of caffeine on oxy-Hb, cognition and mood were eradicated.

Conclusions

Combining L-theanine with caffeine, at levels and ratios equivalent to one to two cups of tea, eliminated the vasoconstrictive effect and behavioural effects of caffeine. This supports previous findings of an interaction between these substances, despite a lack of effects of L-theanine in isolation. However, at the levels tested here, this did not lead to a positive impact on behaviour.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.