Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2015Financiación no declaradaAcceso abierto

The effect of acute vs chronic magnesium supplementation on exercise and recovery on resistance exercise, blood pressure and total peripheral resistance on normotensive adults

Kass LS, Poeira F

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 18 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2015-04-23 · J Int Soc Sports Nutr · vol. 12 · número 1 · pág. 19
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
32 citas · más que el 74% de estudios similares · 0.9× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
44 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Magnesium in Health and Disease · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology · Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Palabras clave
Medicine, Bench press, Blood pressure, Magnesium, Clinical nutrition, Placebo, Resistance training, Internal medicine, Anesthesia
MeSH
cardiovascular system, humans, magnesium, diet, cross-over studies, double-blind method, blood pressure, vascular resistance, dietary supplements, adult, middle aged, female, male, muscle strength, resistance training, recommended dietary allowances

2 autores

  • Lindsy S. Kass🇬🇧 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Hertfordshire
  • Filipe Poeira🇬🇧University of Hertfordshire

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Magnesium supplementation has previously shown reductions in blood pressure of up to 12 mmHg. A positive relationship between magnesium supplementation and performance gains in resistance exercise has also been seen. However, no previous studies have investigated loading strategies to optimise response. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of oral magnesium supplementation on resistance exercise and vascular response after intense exercise for an acute and chronic loading strategy on a 2-day repeat protocol.

Methods

The study was a randomised, double-blind, cross-over design, placebo controlled 2 day repeat measure protocol (n = 13). Intense exercise (40 km time trial) was followed by bench press at 80% 1RM to exhaustion, with blood pressure and total peripheral resistance (TPR) recorded. 300 mg/d elemental magnesium was supplemented for either a 1 (A) or 4 (Chr) week loading strategy. Food diaries were recorded.

Results

Dietary magnesium intake was above the Reference Nutrient Intake (RNI) for all groups. Bench press showed a significant increase of 7.7% (p = 0.031) [corrected] for A on day 1. On day 2 A showed no decrease in performance whilst Chr showed a 32.1% decrease. On day 2 post-exercise systolic blood pressure (SBP) was significantly lower in both A (p = 0.0.47) and Chr (p = 0.016) groups. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) showed significant decreases on day 2 solely for A (p = 0.047) with no changes in the Chr. TPR reduced for A on days 1 and 2 (p = 0.031) with Chr showing an increase on day 1 (p = 0.008) and no change on day 2.

Conclusion

There was no cumulative effect of Chr supplementation compared to A. A group showed improvement for bench press concurring with previous research which was not seen in Chr. On day 2 A showed a small non-significant increase but not a decrement as expected with Chr showing a decrease. DBP showed reductions in both Chr and A loading, agreeing with previous literature. This is suggestive of a different mechanism for BP reduction than for muscular strength. TPR showed greater reductions with A than Chr, which would not be expected as both interventions had reductions in BP, which is associated with TPR.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.