Butyrylated starch intake can prevent red meat-induced O6-methyl-2-deoxyguanosine adducts in human rectal tissue: a randomised clinical trial
Le Leu RK, Winter JM, Christophersen CT, Young GP, Humphreys KJ, Hu Y, Gratz SW, Miller RB, Topping DL, Bird AR, Conlon MA
The British journal of nutrition · 117 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Alimentación controladaSolo mecanismosDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Solo mecanismos
- Consumo medido con
- Comida provista por los investigadores
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Gobierno
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
- Gobierno
- Medical Research Council
- Gobierno
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Subvenciones
- National Health and Medical Research Council (535079)
Según 3 financiadores declarados.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2015-06-17 · Br J Nutr · vol. 114 · número 2 · págs. 220–230
- Editorial
- Cambridge University Press
- Citado
- 162 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 20.0× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 61 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods · Food composition and properties · Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Palabras clave
- Resistant starch, Red meat, Food science, Biology, Medicine, Starch, Internal medicine, Animal science, Chemistry
- MeSH
- colon, feces, animals, cattle, humans, bacteroides, clostridium, escherichia coli, ruminococcus, lactobacillus, zea mays, starch, amylose, dna adducts, deoxyguanosine, diet, cross-over studies, double-blind method, energy intake, meat, middle aged, diet records, female, male, cooking, microbiota
11 autores
- Richard K. Le Leu🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Flinders University; Health Sciences and Nutrition; Animal, Food and Health Sciences
- Jean M. Winter🇦🇺Flinders University
- Claus Thagaard Christophersen🇦🇺Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Health Sciences and Nutrition; Animal, Food and Health Sciences
- Graeme Paul Young🇦🇺Flinders University
- Karen J. Humphreys🇦🇺Flinders University
- Ying Chuan Hu🇦🇺Flinders University
- Silvia W. Gratz🇬🇧University of Aberdeen
- Rosalind B. Miller🇦🇺Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
- David L. Topping🇦🇺Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Health Sciences and Nutrition; Animal, Food and Health Sciences
- Anthony R. Bird🇦🇺Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Health Sciences and Nutrition; Animal, Food and Health Sciences
- Michael Allan Conlon🇦🇺Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Health Sciences and Nutrition; Animal, Food and Health Sciences
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Epidemiological studies have identified increased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk with high red meat (HRM) intakes, whereas dietary fibre intake appears to be protective. In the present study, we examined whether a HRM diet increased rectal O(6)-methyl-2-deoxyguanosine (O(6)MeG) adduct levels in healthy human subjects, and whether butyrylated high-amylose maize starch (HAMSB) was protective. A group of twenty-three individuals consumed 300 g/d of cooked red meat without (HRM diet) or with 40 g/d of HAMSB (HRM+HAMSB diet) over 4-week periods separated by a 4-week washout in a randomised cross-over design. Stool and rectal biopsy samples were collected for biochemical, microbial and immunohistochemical analyses at baseline and at the end of each 4-week intervention period. The HRM diet increased rectal O(6)MeG adducts relative to its baseline by 21% (P < 0.01), whereas the addition of HAMSB to the HRM diet prevented this increase. Epithelial proliferation increased with both the HRM (P < 0.001) and HRM + HAMSB (P < 0.05) diets when compared with their respective baseline levels, but was lower following the HRM + HAMSB diet compared with the HRM diet (P < 0.05). Relative to its baseline, the HRM + HAMSB diet increased the excretion of SCFA by over 20% (P < 0.05) and increased the absolute abundances of the Clostridium coccoides group (P < 0.05), the Clostridium leptum group (P < 0.05), Lactobacillus spp. (P < 0.01), Parabacteroides distasonis (P < 0.001) and Ruminococcus bromii (P < 0.05), but lowered Ruminococcus torques (P < 0.05) and the proportions of Ruminococcus gnavus, Ruminococcus torques and Escherichia coli (P < 0.01). HRM consumption could increase the risk of CRC through increased formation of colorectal epithelial O(6)MeG adducts. HAMSB consumption prevented red meat-induced adduct formation, which may be associated with increased stool SCFA levels and/or changes in the microbiota composition.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.