Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2015Financiación no declarada

Coping-Infused Dialogue through Patient-Preferred Live Music: A Medical Music Therapy Protocol and Randomized Pilot Study for Hospitalized Organ Transplant Patients

Hogan TJ, Silverman MJ

Journal of music therapy · 11 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2015-01-01 · J Music Ther · vol. 52 · número 3 · págs. 420–436
Editorial
Oxford University Press
Citado
25 citas · más que el 96% de estudios similares · 7.3× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
31 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Music Therapy and Health · Art Therapy and Mental Health · Music Education and Analysis
Palabras clave
organ transplant recipients, mood, positive affect, negative affect, pain, coping strategies, psychoeducation, stressor identification, patient engagement
MeSH
humans, treatment outcome, relaxation, music therapy, postoperative care, organ transplantation, pilot projects, adaptation, psychological, affect, anxiety, music, adult, patient satisfaction, female, male, relaxation therapy, postoperative pain

2 autores

  • Tyler James Hogan🇺🇸University of Minnesota
  • Michael Joseph Silverman🇺🇸University of Minnesota

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Solid organ transplant patients often experience a variety of psychosocial stressors that can lead to distress and may hinder successful recovery. Using coping-infused dialogue (CID) through patient- preferred live music (PPLM) music therapy sessions may improve mood and decrease pain while also imparting psychoeducational knowledge concerning the identification of local and global problems and coping skills.

Objective

The purpose of this pilot study was to develop a coping-based medical music therapy protocol that combines coping-infused dialogue (CID) with patient-preferred live music (PPLM) and measure the effects of the resulting CID-PPLM protocol on mood (positive and negative affect) and pain in hospitalized transplant patients.

Methods

Our study used a pre-/posttest single-session wait-list control design. Participants (N=25) were randomly assigned to experimental (CID-PPLM) or control (usual care) conditions. Participants in the CID-PPLM condition received a single 30-minute session that integrated stressor identification and knowledge of coping skills (CID) with patient-preferred live music (PPLM).

Results

Results indicated no between-group differences at pretest and significant correlations between pre- and posttest measures. Concerning posttest ANCOVA analyses, there were significant between-group differences in positive affect, negative affect, and pain, with experimental participants having more favorable posttest scores than control participants. Effect sizes were in the medium-to-large range for positive affect (η2=.198), negative affect (η2=.422), and pain (η2=.303).

Conclusions

CID through receptive PPLM may be an effective protocol for improving mood and decreasing pain in organ transplant recipients. MT interventions can be an important tool to develop rapport and enhance outcomes with patients. As greater engagement during interventions may have stronger treatment effects, we recommend future research examining patient engagement as a potential mediator of intervention effects, as well as the number of sessions required to maximize clinical outcomes.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.