Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2016Financiación no declarada

Efficacy of low-level laser therapy associated to orthoses for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized single-blinded controlled trial

Barbosa RI, Fonseca Mde C, Rodrigues EK, Tamanini G, Marcolino AM, Mazzer N, Guirro RR, MacDermid J

Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation · 16 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2016-08-10 · J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil · vol. 29 · número 3 · págs. 459–466
Editorial
IOS Press
Citado
19 citas · más que el 85% de estudios similares · 2.1× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
49 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Peripheral Nerve Disorders · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Occupational health in dentistry
Palabras clave
carpal tunnel syndrome, low-level laser therapy, wrist orthoses, patient education, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, symptom severity, functional scores, pinch strength
MeSH
humans, carpal tunnel syndrome, single-blind method, splints, middle aged, female, male, patient education as topic, visual analog scale, low-level light therapy, conservative treatment

8 autores

  • Rafael Inácio Barbosa🇧🇷 · autor de correspondenciaUniversidade de São Paulo; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Marisa de Cássia Registro Fonseca🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Eula Katucha da Silva Rodrigues🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Guilherme Tamanini🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Alexandre Márcio Marcolino🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Nílton Mazzer🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Rinaldo Roberto de Jesus Guirro🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Joy Christine MacDermid🇨🇦McMaster University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

Compare the efficacy of orthoses and patient education with and without the addition to Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT - 660 nm, 30 mW, a continuous regime and bean area of 0.06 cm2). The laser irradiation was delivered with the fluency of 10J/cm2 in patients with mild and moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS).

Methods

48 patients were randomized and 30 finished the protocol (a sample loss of 37.5%), 90% female and 10% males. Randomization was applied to allocate the patients in each one of the groups, with association or not to LLLT (group orthoses or LLLT and orthoses). All of them were submitted to ergonomic home orientations. The short-term symptoms and function outcome were assessed through: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) - Severity of Symptoms (SS) Functional Score (FS). Pain (VAS), Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, 2PD and pinch strength was used for characterization of the sample. Most of the participants were women, over 4th decade enrolled on heavy hand duties occupations, right-handed, 66.7% affected on dominant hand, without alterations in sensory median nerve thresholds or pinch strength.

Results

Both groups showed a reduction of total BCTQ score and its subdomains after six weeks, with significant difference (p< 0.05), comparing to baseline. No significant difference was found between groups. A Minimal clinical change was observed after the intervention in 92.3% of participants for BCTQ subdomain severity of symptoms at individual comparison for LLLT and orthoses group and 76.5% for the orthoses group, demonstrating clinical relevance. Effect size Cohen's index was moderate for the severity of symptoms.

Conclusion

LLLT in association to orthoses and ergonomic orientation seems to be effective in short-term symptoms relieve for patients with mild and moderate CTS.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.