A Meta-Analysis of Soccer Injuries on Artificial Turf and Natural Grass
Williams JH, Akogyrem E, Williams JR
Journal of sports medicine (Hindawi Publishing Corporation) · 7 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2013-01-01 · J Sports Med (Hindawi Publ Corp) · vol. 2013 · págs. 1–6
- Editorial
- Hindawi Publishing Corporation
- Citado
- 23 citas · más que el 25% de estudios similares · 0.1× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 24 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Sports injuries and prevention · Injury Epidemiology and Prevention · Sports Performance and Training
- Palabras clave
- Incidence (geometry), Mathematics, Animal science, Medicine, Demography, Biology, Geometry
5 autores
- Jay H. Williams🇺🇸Virginia Tech
- Jay H. Williams🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaVirginia Tech
- Emmanuel Akogyrem🇺🇸Virginia Tech
- Jeremy R. Williams🇺🇸Virginia Tech
- Jeremy R. Williams🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaVirginia Tech
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
The goal of this investigation was to determine if playing or training on third-generation artificial turf (AT) surfaces increases the incidence rate of injuries compared to natural grass (NG) surfaces. This was accomplished by a meta-analysis performed on previously published research. Eight studies met the criteria of competitive soccer players, participation on both surfaces, and presentation of both exposure time and injury occurrence. Exposure time and injury incidence values were used to generate injury rate ratios (IRRs, AT/NG) for all injuries as well as specific injuries. Subgroup analyses were also performed by condition (match or training), gender, and age (youth or adult). The overall IRR was 0.86 (P < 0.05) suggesting a lower injury risk on AT than NG. However, there was considerable heterogeneity between studies. Analyses of individual injuries and subgroups found that in many cases IRR values were significantly less than 1.0. In no case was the IRR significantly greater than 1.0. Based on this, it appears that the risk of sustaining an injury on AT under some conditions might be lowered compared to NG. However, until more is known about how issues such as altered playing styles affect injury incidence, it is difficult to make firm conclusions regarding the influence of AT on player safety.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.