Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2015Financiación no declaradaAcceso abierto

Early results of low-level laser application for masticatory muscle pain: a double-blind randomized clinical study

Sancakli E, Gökçen-Röhlıg B, Balık A, Öngül D, Kıpırdı S, Keskın H

BMC oral health · 50 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2015-10-23 · BMC Oral Health · vol. 15 · número 1 · pág. 131
Editorial
BioMed Central
Citado
74 citas · más que el 98% de estudios similares · 9.2× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
33 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dental Erosion and Treatment
Palabras clave
Medicine, Palpation, Masticatory force, Placebo, Low level laser therapy, Mann–Whitney U test, Tenderness, Masseter muscle, Oral and maxillofacial surgery, Randomized controlled trial, Physical therapy, Orthodontics, Laser therapy, Dentistry, Laser, Surgery, Internal medicine
MeSH
masticatory muscles, humans, temporomandibular joint disorders, double-blind method, adult, female, male, laser therapy, pain management

6 autores

  • Erkan Sancaklı🇹🇷 · autor de correspondenciaIstanbul University
  • Bilge Gökçen Röhli̇g🇹🇷Istanbul University
  • Ali Balık🇹🇷Istanbul University
  • Değer Öngül🇹🇷Istanbul University
  • Selin Kıpırdı🇹🇷Istanbul University
  • Haluk Keskın🇹🇷Istanbul University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

To evaluate the effect of Low Level Laser (LLL) application at the points of greatest pain in patients with chronic masticatory muscle pain.

Methods

A total number of 30 (21 women, 9 men, with a mean age of 39.2) were selected after the diagnosis of MPDS according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorder (RDC/TMD). The patients were randomly divided into three groups; laser group I (n = 10); patients received the LLL at the point of greatest pain, laser group II (n = 10); patients received LLL at pre-established points in the effected muscles and placebo group (n = 10). LLL and placebo were applied three times per week, for a total of 12 sessions. Mandibular mobility was examined, masticator muscles tenderness were assessed and PPT values were obtained. Subjective pain levels were evaluated using VAS. The measurements performed before the treatment and after the completion of the therapy. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, and frequency) Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test and paired-sample t-tests were used for analysis.

Results

In both laser groups, there was a statically significant reduction in PPT values of the muscles, number of muscles without any pain on palpation increased significantly, mandibular movements' ranges were improved. Laser group I demonstrated statistically better results than the Laser group II in all of the measured values. Plasebo group did not show any statistically difference in any of the measured values.

Conclusions

LLLT can be accepted as an alternative treatment modality in the management of masticatory muscle pain and direct irradiation seems to effect better.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN31085 , Date of registration 28/08/20145.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.