Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2016Financiado por la industriaVínculos de autores con la industriaAcceso abierto

Financiado en parte por Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, Consumer Healthcare Products Association, Natural Products Association, Council for Responsible Nutrition

Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and risk of fractures: an updated meta-analysis from the National Osteoporosis Foundation

Weaver CM, Alexander DD, Boushey CJ, Dawson-Hughes B, Lappe JM, LeBoff MS, Liu S, Looker AC, Wallace TC, Wang DD

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 381 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Vínculos de autores con la industriaFinanciado por la industria

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiado por la industria
Gobierno
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Empresa
Eli Lilly and Company
Empresa
Pfizer
Grupo de la industria
Consumer Healthcare Products Association
Gobierno
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Gobierno
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Gobierno
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Gobierno
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Gobierno
NIAMS NIH HHS
Grupo de la industria
Natural Products Association
Grupo de la industria
Council for Responsible Nutrition
Autores
Al menos un autor declara un vínculo económico con la industria
Subvenciones
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR059775)

Según 11 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2015-10-28 · Osteoporos Int · vol. 27 · número 1 · págs. 367–376
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
615 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 26.2× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
54 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY-NC
Áreas de investigación
Vitamin D Research Studies · Bone health and osteoporosis research · Nutrition and Health Studies
Palabras clave
calcium supplementation, vitamin D supplementation, fracture prevention, hip fracture, osteoporosis, fracture risk reduction, older adults, Women's Health Initiative
MeSH
humans, osteoporosis, postmenopausal, calcium, vitamin d, drug therapy, combination, risk assessment, dietary supplements, bone density conservation agents, randomized controlled trials as topic, osteoporotic fractures

10 autores

  • Connie M. Weaver🇺🇸Purdue University West Lafayette
  • Dominik D. Alexander
  • Carol J. BousheyUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center
  • Bess Dawson‐Hughes🇺🇸Tufts University; Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging
  • Joan M. Lappe🇺🇸Creighton University
  • Meryl Susan LeBoff🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • S. Liu🇺🇸Tufts University
  • Anne C. Looker🇺🇸Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Health Statistics
  • Taylor C. Wallace🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaGeorge Mason University; Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation
  • D. D. Wang🇺🇸Tufts University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Unlabelled

The aim was to meta-analyze randomized controlled trials of calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and fracture prevention. Meta-analysis showed a significant 15 % reduced risk of total fractures (summary relative risk estimate [SRRE], 0.85; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.98) and a 30 % reduced risk of hip fractures (SRRE, 0.70; 95 % CI, 0.56-0.87).

Introduction

Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation has been widely recommended to prevent osteoporosis and subsequent fractures; however, considerable controversy exists regarding the association of such supplementation and fracture risk. The aim was to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [RCTs] of calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and fracture prevention in adults.

Methods

A PubMed literature search was conducted for the period from July 1, 2011 through July 31, 2015. RCTs reporting the effect of calcium plus vitamin D supplementation on fracture incidence were selected from English-language studies. Qualitative and quantitative information was extracted; random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to generate summary relative risk estimates (SRREs) for total and hip fractures. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and the I (2) statistic, and potential for publication bias was assessed.

Results

Of the citations retrieved, eight studies including 30,970 participants met criteria for inclusion in the primary analysis, reporting 195 hip fractures and 2231 total fractures. Meta-analysis of all studies showed that calcium plus vitamin D supplementation produced a statistically significant 15 % reduced risk of total fractures (SRRE, 0.85; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.98) and a 30 % reduced risk of hip fractures (SRRE, 0.70; 95 % CI, 0.56-0.87). Numerous sensitivity and subgroup analyses produced similar summary associations. A limitation is that this study utilized data from subgroup analysis of the Women's Health Initiative.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis of RCTs supports the use of calcium plus vitamin D supplements as an intervention for fracture risk reduction in both community-dwelling and institutionalized middle-aged to older adults.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.