Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2015Acceso abierto

Red and Processed Meat Consumption Increases Risk for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A PRISMA-Compliant Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Yang L, Dong J, Jiang S, Shi W, Xu X, Huang H, You X, Liu H

Medicine · 24 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2015-11-01 · Medicine (Baltimore) · vol. 94 · número 45 · pág. e1729
Editorial
Wolters Kluwer
Citado
29 citas · más que el 75% de estudios similares · 0.8× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
49 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY-ND
Áreas de investigación
Cancer Risks and Factors · Nutritional Studies and Diet
Palabras clave
Medicine, Lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, Consumption (sociology), Environmental health, Internal medicine
MeSH
humans, lymphoma, non-hodgkin, diet, risk factors, meat, observational studies as topic

8 autores

  • Li Yang🇨🇳Nantong University; Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University; Nantong Tumor Hospital
  • Jianming Dong🇨🇳Nantong University; Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University; Nantong Tumor Hospital; Yancheng First People's Hospital
  • Shenghua Jiang🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaNantong University; Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University; Nantong Tumor Hospital; Yancheng First People's Hospital
  • Wenyu Shi🇨🇳Nantong University; Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University; Nantong Tumor Hospital; Yancheng First People's Hospital
  • Xiao‐Hong Nancy Xu🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaNantong University; Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University; Nantong Tumor Hospital; Yancheng First People's Hospital
  • Hongming Huang🇨🇳Nantong University; Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University; Nantong Tumor Hospital; Yancheng First People's Hospital
  • Xuefen You🇨🇳Nantong University; Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University; Nantong Tumor Hospital; Yancheng First People's Hospital
  • Hong Liu🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaNantong University; Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University; Nantong Tumor Hospital; Yancheng First People's Hospital

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

The association between consumption of red and processed meat and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of the published observational studies to explore this relationship.We searched databases in MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify observational studies which evaluated the association between consumption of red and processed meat and risk of NHL. Quality of included studies was evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). Random-effects models were used to calculate summary relative risk (SRR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).We identified a total of 16 case-control and 4 prospective cohort studies, including 15,189 subjects with NHL. The SRR of NHL comparing the highest and lowest categories were 1.32 (95% CI: 1.12-1.55) for red meat and 1.17 (95% CI: 1.07-1.29) for processed meat intake. Stratified analysis indicated that a statistically significant risk association between consumption of red and processed meat and NHL risk was observed in case-control studies, but not in cohort studies. The SRR was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.04-1.18) for per 100 g/day increment in red meat intake and 1.28 (95% CI: 1.08-1.53) for per 50 g/day increment in processed meat intake. There was evidence of a nonlinear association for intake of processed meat, but not for intake of red meat.Findings from our meta-analysis indicate that consumption of red and processed meat may be related to NHL risk. More prospective epidemiological studies that control for important confounders and focus on the NHL risk related with different levels of meat consumption are required to clarify this association.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-ND).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.