Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2015Acceso abierto

Interaction between Red Meat Intake and NAT2 Genotype in Increasing the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Japanese and African Americans

Wang H, Iwasaki M, Haiman CA, Kono S, Wilkens LR, Keku TO, Berndt SI, Tsugane S, Le Marchand L

PloS one · 18 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
U.S. Department of Defense
Gobierno
National Institutes of Health
Gobierno
National Human Genome Research Institute
Gobierno
National Cancer Institute
Gobierno
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Gobierno
NCI NIH HHS
Gobierno
NHGRI NIH HHS
Gobierno
NIDDK NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Cancer Institute (CA148085); National Cancer Institute (RC2CA148085); National Cancer Institute (R01 CA126895); National Cancer Institute (CA63464); U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH0810383); National Cancer Institute (R01CA063464); National Cancer Institute (P30 CA016086); National Cancer Institute (R01-CA66635); National Cancer Institute (R37 CA054281); National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG004726); National Cancer Institute (P30CA071789); National Human Genome Research Institute (HG004726); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30‐DK‐034987); U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH); National Cancer Institute (U01 CA164973); National Institutes of Health (CA1326792); National Cancer Institute (R01 CA066635); U.S. Department of Defense (CA54281); National Cancer Institute (CA 54281); National Institutes of Health (W81XWH); U.S. Department of Defense (CA63464); National Institutes of Health (P30 DK); National Cancer Institute (CA1326792); National Cancer Institute (U01 CA063464); National Cancer Institute (CA126895-S01); National Cancer Institute (R01 CA054281); National Institutes of Health (DK034987); National Institutes of Health (U01CA164973); National Institutes of Health (P30DK034987); National Institutes of Health (CA164973); National Institutes of Health (CA148085); National Institutes of Health (R01 CA 66635); National Institutes of Health (CA54281); National Institutes of Health (HG004726); National Institutes of Health (CA63464); National Institutes of Health (CA126895); National Institutes of Health (R01 CA126895)

Según 8 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2015-12-18 · PLoS One · vol. 10 · número 12 · pág. e0144955
Editorial
Public Library of Science
Citado
28 citas · más que el 87% de estudios similares · 1.8× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
40 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · PUBLIC-DOMAIN
Áreas de investigación
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease · Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques · Nutritional Studies and Diet
Palabras clave
Red meat, Colorectal cancer, Quartile, Genotype, Phenotype, Genotype-phenotype distinction, Medicine, Genotyping, Internal medicine, Biology, Cancer, Genetics, Food science, Gene, Confidence interval
MeSH
humans, colorectal neoplasms, genetic predisposition to disease, arylamine n-acetyltransferase, risk factors, genotype, polymorphism, single nucleotide, aged, middle aged, united states, japan, female, male, genome-wide association study, red meat, asian people, black or african american

9 autores

  • Hansong Wang🇺🇸University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa; University of Hawaii System; Cancer Center of Hawaii; University of Hawaii Cancer Center
  • Motoki Iwasaki
  • Christopher A. Haiman🇺🇸University of Southern California
  • Suminori Kono🇯🇵Kyushu University
  • Lynne Ross Wilkens🇺🇸University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa; University of Hawaii System; Cancer Center of Hawaii; University of Hawaii Cancer Center
  • Temitope O. Keku🇺🇸University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Sonja I. Berndt🇺🇸National Institutes of Health; National Cancer Institute
  • Shoichiro Tsugane
  • Loı̈c Le Marchand🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa; University of Hawaii System; Cancer Center of Hawaii; University of Hawaii Cancer Center

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Heterocyclic aromatic amines formed in cooked meat may be an underlying mechanism for the red meat-colorectal cancer (CRC) association. These compounds require bioactivaction by N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2). An interaction effect between red meat consumption and NAT2 in increasing CRC risk has been inconsistently reported in whites. We investigated this interaction in two populations in which the high-activity rapid NAT2 phenotype is 10- and 2-fold more common than in whites. We meta-analyzed four studies of Japanese (2,217 cases, 3,788 controls) and three studies of African Americans (527 cases, 4,527 controls). NAT2 phenotype was inferred from an optimized seven-SNP genotyping panel. Processed and total red meat intakes were associated with an increased CRC risk in Japanese and in both ethnic groups combined (P's ≤ 0.002). We observed an interaction between processed meat intake and NAT2 in Japanese (P = 0.04), African Americans (P = 0.02), and in both groups combined (P = 0.006). The association of processed meat with CRC was strongest among individuals with the rapid NAT2 phenotype (combined analysis, OR for highest vs. lowest quartile: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.28-2.05; Ptrend = 8.0×10-5), intermediate among those with the intermediate NAT2 phenotype (1.29, 95% CI: 1.05-1.59; Ptrend = 0.05) and null among those with the slow phenotype (Ptrend = 0.45). A similar interaction was found for NAT2 and total red meat (Pinteraction = 0.03). Our findings support a role for NAT2 in modifying the association between red meat consumption and CRC in Japanese and African Americans.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC0).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.