Association between nut consumption and coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis
Weng YQ, Yao J, Guo ML, Qin QJ, Li P
Coronary artery disease · 13 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2015-12-24 · Coron Artery Dis · vol. 27 · número 3 · págs. 227–232
- Editorial
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Citado
- 15 citas · más que el 75% de estudios similares · 0.9× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 33 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Nuts composition and effects · Oral Health Pathology and Treatment · Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
- Palabras clave
- Medicine, Relative risk, Nut, Confidence interval, Publication bias, Meta-analysis, Random effects model, Demography, Consumption (sociology), Coronary heart disease, Epidemiology, Internal medicine
- MeSH
- humans, nuts, coronary disease, linear models, odds ratio, risk assessment, risk factors, least-squares analysis, risk reduction behavior, time factors, recommended dietary allowances, protective factors, diet, healthy
5 autores
- Yunqi Weng🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaQingdao University
- Jian Yao🇨🇳Qingdao University
- Minglei Guo🇨🇳Qingdao University
- Qiaoji Qin🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaQingdao University
- Peng Li🇨🇳Qingdao University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Objectives
Epidemiological studies evaluating the association of nut consumption with coronary heart disease (CHD) risk have produced inconsistent results. The current study aimed to assess the CHD risk for the highest versus the lowest categories of nut consumption, the dose-response association of CHD for every 1 serving/week increment in nut consumption, and the heterogeneity among studies and publication bias.
Methods
Pertinent studies were identified by a search in PubMed and Web of Knowledge up to January 2014. A random-effect model was used to combine the results. The dose-response relationship was assessed by restricted cubic spline and variance-weighted least squares regression analysis. Publication bias was estimated using Egger's regression asymmetry test.
Results
Ten articles with 14 studies including 6302 CHD cases were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled results suggested that highest nut consumption amount versus lowest amount was associated significantly with a reduced risk of CHD [summary relative risk (RR)=0.681, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.592-0.783, I(2)=62.7%], especially among USA (summary RR=0.671, 95% CI=0.591-0.761) and prospective studies (summary RR=0.660, 95% CI=0.581-0.748). A linear dose-response relationship was found, and the risk of CHD decreased by 10% for every 1 serving/week increase intake of nut (summary RR=0.90, 95% CI=0.87-0.94) No publication bias was found.
Conclusion
Our analysis suggested that higher nut consumption might have a protective effect on CHD risk, especially in the USA, which needs to be confirmed.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.