Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2016Financiado por la industriaVínculos de autores con la industriaAcceso abierto

Pharmacokinetic analysis and comparison of caffeine administered rapidly or slowly in coffee chilled or hot versus chilled energy drink in healthy young adults

White JR, Padowski JM, Zhong Y, Chen G, Luo S, Lazarus P, Layton ME, McPherson S

Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 72 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Vínculos de autores con la industriaFinanciado por la industria

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Sin resultado de salud

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiado por la industria
Gobierno
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Gobierno
NIEHS NIH HHS
Autores
Al menos un autor declara un vínculo económico con la industria
Subvenciones
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01-ES025460)

Según 2 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2016-04-20 · Clin Toxicol (Phila) · vol. 54 · número 4 · págs. 308–312
Editorial
Taylor & Francis
Citado
117 citas · más que el 99% de estudios similares · 10.3× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
12 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Áreas de investigación
Coffee research and impacts · Tea Polyphenols and Effects · Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Palabras clave
Caffeine, Pharmacokinetics, Crossover study, Cmax, Context (archaeology), Analysis of variance, Chemistry, Medicine, Pharmacology, Internal medicine, Biology, Placebo
MeSH
humans, caffeine, cross-over studies, temperature, coffee, adolescent, adult, female, male, young adult, energy drinks

8 autores

  • John Raymond White🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaWashington State University Spokane
  • Jeannie M. Padowski🇺🇸Washington State University Spokane
  • Yili Zhong🇺🇸Washington State University Spokane
  • Gang Chen🇺🇸Washington State University Spokane
  • Shaman Luo🇺🇸Washington State University Spokane
  • Philip J. Lazarus🇺🇸Washington State University Spokane
  • Matthew E. Layton🇺🇸Washington State University Spokane
  • Sterling Marshall McPherson🇺🇸Providence Regional Medical Center Everett; Washington State University Spokane; Providence Health & Services

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Context

There is a paucity of data describing the impact of type of beverage (coffee versus energy drink), different rates of consumption and different temperature of beverages on the pharmacokinetic disposition of caffeine. Additionally, there is concern that inordinately high levels of caffeine may result from the rapid consumption of cold energy drinks.

Objective

The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of caffeine under various drink temperature, rate of consumption and vehicle (coffee versus energy drink) conditions.

Materials

Five caffeine (dose = 160 mg) conditions were evaluated in an open-label, group-randomized, crossover fashion. After the administration of each caffeine dose, 10 serial plasma samples were harvested. Caffeine concentration was measured via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), and those concentrations were assessed by non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. The calculated mean pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed statistically by one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (RM ANOVA). If differences were found, each group was compared to the other by all pair-wise multiple comparison.

Results

Twenty-four healthy subjects ranging in age from 18 to 30 completed the study. The mean caffeine concentration time profiles were similar with overlapping SDs at all measured time points. The ANOVA revealed significant differences in mean Cmax and Vd ss/F, but no pair-wise comparisons reached statistical significance. No other differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were found.

Discussion

The results of this study are consistent with previous caffeine pharmacokinetic studies and suggest that while rate of consumption, temperature of beverage and vehicle (coffee versus energy drink) may be associated with slightly different pharmacokinetic parameters, the overall impact of these variables is small.

Conclusion

This study suggests that caffeine absorption and exposure from coffee and energy drink is similar irrespective of beverage temperature or rate of consumption.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC-ND).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.