Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2017Financiación no declarada

Low-level laser therapy as a treatment for androgenetic alopecia

Afifi L, Maranda EL, Zarei M, Delcanto GM, Falto-Aizpurua L, Kluijfhout WP, Jimenez JJ

Lasers in surgery and medicine · 44 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2016-04-25 · Lasers Surg Med · vol. 49 · número 1 · págs. 27–39
Editorial
Wiley
Citado
71 citas · más que el 99% de estudios similares · 9.9× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
43 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Hair Growth and Disorders · Dermatologic Treatments and Research · Body Contouring and Surgery
Palabras clave
Laser therapy, Dermatology, Medicine, Low level laser therapy, Laser treatment, Laser, Optics, Physics
MeSH
hair, humans, alopecia, treatment outcome, esthetics, adult, middle aged, patient satisfaction, female, male, young adult, low-level light therapy

7 autores

  • Ladan Afifi🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Miami
  • Eric Laurent Maranda🇺🇸University of Miami
  • Mina Zarei🇺🇸University of Miami
  • Gina M. DelCanto🇺🇸University of Miami
  • Leyre Ainara Falto-Aizpurua🇺🇸University of Miami
  • Wouter P. Kluijfhout🇳🇱University Medical Center Utrecht
  • Joaquin Juan Jimenez🇺🇸University of Miami

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background and objectives

Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) affects 50% of males by age 50 and 50% of females by age 80. Recently, the use of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been proposed as a treatment for hair loss and to stimulate hair regrowth in AGA. This paper aims to review the existing research studies to determine whether LLLT is an effective therapy for AGA based on objective measurements and patient satisfaction.

Study design

A systematic literature review was done to identify articles on Medline, Google Scholar, and Embase that were published between January 1960 and November 2015. All search hits were screened by two reviewers and examined for relevant abstracts and titles. Articles were divided based on study design and assessed for risk of bias.

Results

Eleven studies were evaluated, which investigated a total of 680 patients, consisting of 444 males and 236 females. Nine out of 11 studies assessing hair count/hair density found statistically significant improvements in both males and females following LLLT treatment. Additionally, hair thickness and tensile strength significantly improved in two out of four studies. Patient satisfaction was investigated in five studies, and was overall positive, though not as profound as the objective outcomes.

Conclusion

The majority of studies covered in this review found an overall improvement in hair regrowth, thickness, and patient satisfaction following LLLT therapy. Although we should be cautious when interpreting these findings, LLLT therapy seems to be a promising monotherapy for AGA and may serve as an effective alternative for individuals unwilling to use medical therapy or undergo surgical options. Lasers Surg. Med. 49:27-39, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.