Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2016Financiación no declarada

Prenatal Fish Oil Supplementation and Allergy: 6-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Best KP, Sullivan T, Palmer D, Gold M, Kennedy DJ, Martin J, Makrides M

Pediatrics · 48 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2016-05-25 · Pediatrics · vol. 137 · número 6
Editorial
American Academy of Pediatrics
Citado
79 citas · más que el 98% de estudios similares · 8.8× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
32 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Neonatal Respiratory Health Research · Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
Palabras clave
Medicine, Fish oil, Docosahexaenoic acid, Wheeze, Eicosapentaenoic acid, Allergy, Randomized controlled trial, Relative risk, Asthma, Pregnancy, Confidence interval, Polyunsaturated fatty acid, Pediatrics, Immunology, Internal medicine, Fatty acid, Fish <Actinopterygii>
MeSH
animals, humans, dermatophagoides farinae, prenatal exposure delayed effects, hypersensitivity, docosahexaenoic acids, eicosapentaenoic acid, immunoglobulin e, prenatal care, follow-up studies, pregnancy, dietary supplements, adult, child, female, male

7 autores

  • Karen P Best🇦🇺Women's & Children's Health Research Institute; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute
  • Thomas Sullivan🇦🇺The University of Adelaide
  • Debra Jane Palmer🇦🇺The University of Western Australia; Women's & Children's Health Research Institute
  • Michael Gold
  • Declan Kennedy🇦🇺Women's and Children's Hospital
  • James A. Martin🇦🇺Women's and Children's Hospital
  • Maria Makrides🇦🇺Women's & Children's Health Research Institute; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background and objective

Evidence from randomized controlled trials in early infancy suggest that prenatal supplementation with Ω-3 (n-3) long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFA) reduces the incidence of allergic disease characterized by an immunoglobulin E (IgE) response. We aimed to determine whether protective effects were evident in the 6-year-old offspring of women supplemented with n-3 rich fish oil during pregnancy.

Methods

Six-year follow-up of children (n = 706) with a family history of allergic disease from the Docosahexaenoic Acid to Optimize Mother Infant Outcome (DOMInO) trial. Women were randomly allocated to receive n-3 LCPUFA-rich fish oil capsules (800 mg/d docosahexaenoic acid DHA and 100mg/d eicosapentaenoic acid) or vegetable oil capsules (without n-3 LCPUFA). Allergic disease symptoms including eczema, wheeze, rhinitis, and rhino-conjunctivitis, were assessed using the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood questionnaire and sensitization to allergens was measured by skin prick test.

Results

There was no difference in the percentage of children with any IgE-associated allergic disease between the n-3 LCPUFA and control groups (116/367 [31.5%] vs 106/336 [31.5%]; adjusted relative risk, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.33; P = .73). There was a reduction in the percentage of children sensitized to house dust mite Dermatophagoides farinae (49/367 [13.4%] vs 68/336 [20.3%]; adjusted relative risk, 0.67, 95% confidence interval, 0.44-1.00; P = .0495).

Conclusions

Prenatal n-3 LCPUFA supplementation did not reduce IgE-associated allergic disease at 6 years of age. Secondary outcomes were suggestive of a protective effect of the intervention on the incidence of D. farinae sensitization.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.