Dosages of cold-water immersion post exercise on functional and clinical responses: a randomized controlled trial
Machado AF, Almeida AC, Micheletti JK, Vanderlei FM, Tribst MF, Netto Junior J, Pastre CM
Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 48 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Gobierno
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
- Gobierno
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Gobierno
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Subvenciones
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2013/12474‐7); Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (2012/482749)
Según 3 financiadores declarados.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2016-07-19 · Scand J Med Sci Sports · vol. 27 · número 11 · págs. 1356–1363
- Editorial
- Wiley
- Citado
- 65 citas · más que el 94% de estudios similares · 4.1× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 37 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Exercise and Physiological Responses · Sports injuries and prevention · Thermoregulation and physiological responses
- Palabras clave
- Isometric exercise, Muscle damage, Medicine, Creatine kinase, Randomized controlled trial, Delayed onset muscle soreness, Eccentric, Dose, Physical therapy, Anesthesia, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Internal medicine
- MeSH
- muscle, skeletal, humans, water, creatine kinase, exercise, immersion, pain threshold, recovery of function, isometric contraction, male, cold temperature, young adult, myalgia
7 autores
- Aryane Flauzino Machado🇧🇷 · autor de correspondenciaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
- Aline Castilho de Almeida🇧🇷Universidade Federal de São Carlos
- Jéssica Kirsch Micheletti🇧🇷Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
- Franciele Marques Vanderlei🇧🇷Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
- M. F. Tribst🇧🇷Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
- Jayme Netto🇧🇷Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
- Carlos Marcelo Pastre🇧🇷Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Cold-water immersion (CWI) is one of the recovery techniques commonly used by athletes for post-exercise recovery. Nevertheless, the effects of CWI using different temperatures and the dose-response relationship of this technique have not yet been investigated. The aims of this study were to compare the effects of two strategies of CWI, using different water temperatures with passive recovery post exercise in the management of some markers of muscle damage, and to observe whether any of the techniques used caused deleterious effects on performance. Sixty healthy male participants performed an eccentric protocol to induce muscle damage and were then randomized to one of three groups (CWI1: 15 min at 9 °C; CWI2: 15 min at 14 °C; CG: control group). Levels of creatine kinase, muscle soreness, pain threshold, perception of recovery, and maximal voluntary isometric contraction were monitored up to 96 h post exercise. A large effect for time for all outcomes was observed [P < 0.001; CK (ES = 0.516), muscle soreness (ES = 0.368); pain threshold (ES = 0.184); perception of recovery (ES = 0.565); MVIC (ES = 0.273)]. CWI groups presented an earlier recovery for muscle soreness with lower ratings immediately post recovery. For delayed effects, the application of CWI2 (15 min at 14 °C) presented earlier recovery compared with CWI1 and control condition for maximal voluntary isometric contraction (P < 0.05). There were no significant group and interaction (Group × Time) effects. CWI groups acted more efficiently for muscle soreness and performance considering the time of recovery was observed. No evidence was found to suggest dose-response relationship and deleterious effects.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.