Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2016Financiado por la industria

Financiado en parte por Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, Sanofi, InfraRedx

Non-HDL Cholesterol and Triglycerides: Implications for Coronary Atheroma Progression and Clinical Events

Puri R, Nissen SE, Shao M, Elshazly MB, Kataoka Y, Kapadia SR, Tuzcu EM, Nicholls SJ

Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 114 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiado por la industria

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiado por la industria
Empresa
Eli Lilly and Company
Empresa
Pfizer
Empresa
Sanofi
Universidad u hospital
Cleveland Clinic
Empresa
InfraRedx

Según 5 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2016-08-12 · Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol · vol. 36 · número 11 · págs. 2220–2228
Editorial
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citado
142 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 20.2× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
46 trabajos
Acceso
Lectura gratuita
Áreas de investigación
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health · Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins · Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Palabras clave
non-HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, atherosclerosis progression, LDL cholesterol, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, residual cardiovascular risk, major adverse cardiovascular events, intravascular ultrasound, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, C-reactive protein
MeSH
coronary vessels, humans, disease progression, cholesterol, triglycerides, ultrasonography, interventional, treatment outcome, multivariate analysis, linear models, risk factors, predictive value of tests, time factors, aged, middle aged, female, male, clinical trials as topic, coronary artery disease, hypolipidemic agents, kaplan-meier estimate, plaque, atherosclerotic, biomarkers

8 autores

  • Rishi Puri🇺🇸🇦🇺Cleveland Clinic; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute; The University of Adelaide
  • Steven E. Nissen🇺🇸🇦🇺Cleveland Clinic; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute; The University of Adelaide
  • Mingyuan Shao🇺🇸🇦🇺Cleveland Clinic; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute; The University of Adelaide
  • Mohamed Badreldin Elshazly🇺🇸🇦🇺Cleveland Clinic; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute; The University of Adelaide
  • Yu Kataoka🇺🇸🇦🇺Cleveland Clinic; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute; The University of Adelaide
  • Samir Ramesh Kapadia🇺🇸🇦🇺Cleveland Clinic; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute; The University of Adelaide
  • Emin Murat Tuzcu🇺🇸🇦🇺Cleveland Clinic; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute; The University of Adelaide
  • Stephen James Nicholls🇺🇸🇦🇺Cleveland Clinic; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute; The University of Adelaide

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objectives

Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDLC) levels reflect the full burden of cholesterol transported in atherogenic lipoproteins. Genetic studies suggest a causal association between elevated triglycerides (TGs)-rich lipoproteins and atherosclerosis. We evaluated associations between achieved non-HDLC and TG levels on changes in coronary atheroma volume.

Approach and results

Data were analyzed from 9 clinical trials involving 4957 patients with coronary disease undergoing serial intravascular ultrasonography to assess changes in percent atheroma volume (ΔPAV) and were evaluated against on-treatment non-HDLC and TG levels. The effects of lower (0) was associated with achieved TG levels >200 mg/dL, respectively. Lower on-treatment non-HDLC and TG levels associated with significant PAV regression compared with higher non-HDLC and TG levels across all levels of LDLC and C-reactive protein and irrespective of diabetic status (P<0.001 across all comparisons). ΔPAV were more strongly influenced by changes in non-HDLC (β=0.62; P<0.001) compared with changes in LDLC (β=0.51; P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier sensitivity analyses demonstrated significantly greater major adverse cardiovascular event rates in those with higher versus lower non-HDLC and TG levels, with an earlier separation of the non-HDLC compared with the LDLC curve.

Conclusions

Achieved non-HDLC levels seem more closely associated with coronary atheroma progression than LDLC. Plaque progression associates with achieved TGs, but only above levels of 200 mg/dL. These observations support a more prominent role for non-HDLC (and possibly TG) lowering in combating residual cardiovascular risk.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.