Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio de cohortes2016

Maternal creatine in pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study

Dickinson H, Davies-Tuck M, Ellery SJ, Grieger JA, Wallace EM, Snow RJ, Walker DW, Clifton VL

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 25 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
University of Adelaide

Según 1 financiador declarado.

Publicación

Publicado
2016-08-23 · BJOG · vol. 123 · número 11 · págs. 1830–1838
Editorial
Wiley
Citado
27 citas · más que el 80% de estudios similares · 1.5× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
26 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Folate and B Vitamins Research · Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Palabras clave
Creatine, Medicine, Pregnancy, Urine, Cohort, Prospective cohort study, Obstetrics, Urinary system, Gestation, Body mass index, Internal medicine, Fetus, Retrospective cohort study, Cohort study, Endocrinology, Biology
MeSH
humans, asthma, pregnancy complications, birth weight, creatine, linear models, retrospective studies, prospective studies, smoking, parity, fetal development, gestational age, pregnancy, pregnancy trimesters, social class, adult, infant, newborn, biological specimen banks, female

8 autores

  • Hayley Dickinson🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaHudson Institute of Medical Research; Monash University
  • Miranda L. Davies-Tuck🇦🇺Hudson Institute of Medical Research; Monash University
  • Stacey J. Ellery🇦🇺Hudson Institute of Medical Research; Monash University
  • JA Grieger🇦🇺The University of Adelaide
  • Euan Morrison Wallace🇦🇺Hudson Institute of Medical Research; Monash University
  • RJ Snow🇦🇺Deakin University
  • DW Walker🇦🇺Hudson Institute of Medical Research; Monash University
  • Vicki Lee Clifton🇦🇺Translational Research Institute; The University of Queensland; Mater Research; The University of Adelaide

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

To estimate creatine concentrations in maternal plasma and urine, and establish relationships with maternal characteristics, diet and fetal growth.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.

Population

A biobank of plasma and urine samples collected at 13, 18, 30 and 36 weeks' gestation from 287 pregnant women from a prospective cohort of asthmatic and non-asthmatic women.

Methods

Creatine was measured by enzymatic analysis. Change in creatine over pregnancy was assessed using the Friedman test. Linear mixed models regression was used to determine associations between maternal factors and diet with creatine across pregnancy and between creatine with indices of fetal growth at birth.

Main outcome measures

Maternal creatine concentrations, associations between maternal factors and creatine and between creatine and fetal growth parameters.

Results

Maternal smoking, body mass index, asthma and socio-economic status were positively and parity negatively associated with maternal plasma and/or urine creatine. Maternal urine creatine concentration was positively associated with birthweight centile and birth length. After adjustment, each μmol/l increase in maternal urinary creatine was associated with a 1.23 (95% CI 0.44-2.02) unit increase in birthweight centile and a 0.11-cm (95% CI 0.03-0.2) increase in birth length.

Conclusions

Maternal factors and fetal growth measures are associated with maternal plasma and urine creatine concentrations.

Tweetable abstract

Maternal creatine is altered by pregnancy; fetal growth measures are associated with maternal creatine concentrations.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.