Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2017Financiado por la industriaAlimentación controlada

Financiado en parte por Danone, Fonterra Co-Operative Group

Randomized controlled trial of early regular egg intake to prevent egg allergy

Palmer DJ, Sullivan TR, Gold MS, Prescott SL, Makrides M

The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 140 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Alimentación controladaFinanciado por la industria

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
Comida provista por los investigadores

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiado por la industria
Empresa
Danone
Universidad u hospital
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute
Empresa
Fonterra Co-Operative Group
Gobierno
Medical Research Council
Gobierno
National Health and Medical Research Council
Gobierno
Australian National Health and Medical Research Council

Según 6 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2016-08-23 · J Allergy Clin Immunol · vol. 139 · número 5 · págs. 1600–1607.e2
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
206 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 22.5× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
18 trabajos
Acceso
Lectura gratuita
Áreas de investigación
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research · Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions · Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Palabras clave
egg allergy, early allergen introduction, infant nutrition, egg proteins, IgE-mediated allergy, egg-free diet, food allergy prevention
MeSH
humans, egg hypersensitivity, immunoglobulin e, egg proteins, risk factors, double-blind method, eggs, infant, female, male

5 autores

  • Debra Jane Palmer🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaThe University of Western Australia; Women's & Children's Health Research Institute
  • Thomas Sullivan🇦🇺The University of Adelaide
  • Michael Gold🇦🇺Women's and Children's Health Network; The University of Adelaide
  • Susan L. Prescott🇦🇺The Kids Research Institute Australia; The University of Western Australia
  • Maria Makrides🇦🇺Women's & Children's Health Research Institute; Women's and Children's Health Network; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute; The University of Adelaide

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

The ideal age to introduce egg into the infant diet has been debated for the past 2 decades in the context of rising rates of egg allergy.

Objective

We sought to determine whether regular consumption of egg protein from age 4 to 6 months reduces the risk of IgE-mediated egg allergy in infants with hereditary risk, but without eczema.

Methods

Infants aged 4 to 6 months were randomly allocated to receive daily pasteurized raw whole egg powder (n = 407) or a color-matched rice powder (n = 413) to age 10 months. All infants followed an egg-free diet and cooked egg was introduced to both groups at age 10 months. The primary outcome was IgE-mediated egg allergy defined by a positive pasteurized raw egg challenge and egg sensitization at age 12 months.

Results

There was no difference between groups in the percentage of infants with IgE-mediated egg allergy (egg 7.0% vs control 10.3%; adjusted relative risk, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.48-1.17; P = .20). A higher proportion of participants in the egg group stopped taking the study powder because of a confirmed allergic reaction (25 of 407 [6.1%] compared with 6 of 413 [1.5%]). Egg-specific IgG4 levels were substantially higher in the egg group at 12 months (median, 1.22 mgA/L vs control 0.07 mgA/L; P < .0001).

Conclusions

We found no evidence that regular egg intake from age 4 to 6 months substantially alters the risk of egg allergy by age 1 year in infants who are at hereditary risk of allergic disease and had no eczema symptoms at study entry.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.