Skin friction related behaviour of artificial turf systems
Tay SP, Fleming P, Hu X, Forrester S
Journal of sports sciences · 1 cita
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio in vitro o de mecanismos (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Células o muestras de laboratorio
- Resultado principal
- Sin resultado de salud
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2016-08-25 · J Sports Sci · vol. 35 · número 15 · págs. 1500–1507
- Editorial
- Taylor & Francis
- Citado
- 8 citas · más que el 77% de estudios similares · 1.1× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 25 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio) · CC-BY-NC-ND
- Áreas de investigación
- Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Palabras clave
- Parasitic drag, Abrasive, Abrasion (mechanical), Surface finish, Materials science, Surface roughness, Infill, Artificial skin, Coefficient of friction, Composite material, Structural engineering, Biomedical engineering, Engineering, Drag
- MeSH
- skin, humans, athletic injuries, surface properties, friction, facility design and construction, floors and floorcoverings
4 autores
- Sock Peng Tay🇬🇧🇸🇬Loughborough University; Nanyang Technological University
- Paul Richard Fleming🇬🇧🇸🇬 · autor de correspondenciaLoughborough University; Nanyang Technological University
- Xiao Hu🇸🇬Nanyang Technological University
- Steph Forrester🇬🇧🇸🇬Loughborough University; Nanyang Technological University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
The occurrence of skin friction related injuries is an issue for artificial turf sports pitches and remains a barrier to their acceptance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current industry standard Securisport® Sports Surface Tester that measures skin surface related frictional behaviour of artificial turf. Little research has been published about the device and its efficacy, despite its widespread use as a standard FIFA test instrument. To achieve a range of frictional behaviours, several "third generation" (3G) carpet and infill combinations were investigated; friction time profiles throughout the Securisport rotations were assessed in combination with independent measurements of skin roughness before and after friction testing via 3D surface scanning. The results indicated that carpets without infill had greatest friction (coefficients of friction 0.97-1.20) while those completely filled with sand or rubber had similar and lower values independent of carpet type (coefficient of friction (COF) ≈0.57). Surface roughness of a silicone skin (s-skin) decreased after friction testing, with the largest change on sand infilled surfaces, indicating an "abrasive" polishing effect. The combined data show that the s-skin is damaged in a surface-specific manner, thus the Securisport COF values appear to be a poor measure of the potential for skin abrasion. It is proposed that the change in s-skin roughness improves assessment of the potential for skin damage when players slide on artificial turf.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.