Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2016Financiación no declarada

Music Therapy for Preterm Infants and Their Parents: A Meta-analysis

Bieleninik Ł, Ghetti C, Gold C

Pediatrics · 123 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2016-08-25 · Pediatrics · vol. 138 · número 3
Editorial
American Academy of Pediatrics
Citado
232 citas · más que el 95% de estudios similares · 4.1× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
53 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Infant Development and Preterm Care · Music Therapy and Health · Infant Health and Development
Palabras clave
Medicine, Meta-analysis, Music therapy, Pediatrics, Intensive care medicine, Internal medicine, Psychiatry
MeSH
humans, music therapy, anxiety, parents, infant, newborn, infant, premature, intensive care units, neonatal, randomized controlled trials as topic, respiratory rate

3 autores

  • Łucja Bieleninik🇳🇴Uni Research (Norway)
  • Claire M. Ghetti🇳🇴University of Bergen
  • Christian Gold🇳🇴Uni Research (Norway)

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Context

Given the recent expansion of research in the area of music therapy (MT) for preterm infants, there is a need for an up-to-date meta-analysis of rigorously designed studies that focus exclusively on MT.

Objective

To systematically review and meta-analyze the effect of MT on preterm infants and their parents during NICU hospitalization and after discharge from the hospital.

Data sources

PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, ERIC, Web of Science, RILM.

Study selection

Only parallel or crossover randomized controlled trials of MT versus standard care, comparison therapy, or placebo were included.

Data extraction

Independent extraction by 2 reviewers, including risk of bias indicators.

Results

From 1803 relevant records, 16 met inclusion criteria, of which 14 contained appropriate data for meta-analysis involving 964 infant participants and 266 parent participants. Overall, random-effects meta-analyses suggested significant large effects favoring MT for infant respiratory rate (mean difference, -3.91/min, 95% confidence interval, -7.8 to -0.03) and maternal anxiety (standardized mean difference, -1.82, 95% confidence interval, -2.42 to -1.22). There was not enough evidence to confirm or refute any effects of MT on other physiologic and behavioral outcomes or on short-term infant and service-level outcomes. There was considerable heterogeneity between studies for the majority of outcomes.

Limitations

This review is limited by a lack of studies assessing long-term outcomes.

Conclusions

There is sufficient evidence to confirm a large, favorable effect of MT on infant respiratory rate and maternal anxiety. More rigorous research on short-term and long-term infant and parent outcomes is required.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.